BIOLOGY 468/568
PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
STUDENT NAME:
Michelle Johnson and Misty Borja
PROJECT TITLE:
An Ultrastructural Study on the Transportation and Intracellular Incorporation
of Coelenterate Nematocysts by the Predatory Nudibranch Mollusc Hermissenda
crassicornis.
Species Identification
- Kingdom:Animalia
- Phylum: Mollusca
- Class: Gastropoda
- Subclass: Opisthobranchia
- Order: Nudibranchia
- Suborder: Facelinidae
- Family: Facelinidae
- Genus: Hermissenda
- Species: crassicornis
Key Words:
Hermissenda crassicornis , Nematocyst, Aurelia aurita , TEM
, SEM .
INTRODUCTION
Unlike most other marine mollusks which use either shells or cryptic
coloration to provide protection against potential predators, the nudibranch
Hermissenda crassicornis utilizes nematocysts for defense. Nematocysts
are intracellular structures that contain harpoon-like devices that can
be everted rapidly into the predator upon appropriate stimulation (Behrens,
1980). The most unusual aspect of this defense system is that the nudibranch
cannot synthesize its own nematocysts but must rely upon acquiring them
from its consumed prey which is composed mainly of coelenterates.
Very little is known about the process by which functional nematocysts are
selectively transferred from the digested prey into the highly colored,
projecting cerata on the lateral and dorsal surface of the mollusc. The
prey is swallowed and transported through the gut and into the digestive
gland (Wertheim, 1984). During the digestion process, the nematocysts of
the prey remain undischarged and are transported via an undetermined mechanism
through interconnecting tubules from the digestive diverticula into a sac
like structure at the tip of the cerata called the cnidosac.
This research project aims to determine the ultrastructural process by which
nematocyst capsules are transported through the digestive system of the
nudibranch Hermissenda crassicornis and deposited in the cnidosac
of the cerata.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of twenty individual Hermissends crassicornis were collected
from the intertidal zone off Palos Verdes, California in March of 1995.
They were transported in four air filled plastic bags, each containing five
nudibranchs, to the marine laboratories at California State Long Beach where
they were transferred to a 30 gallon glass tank containing aerated seawater.
Each nudibranch was isolated within the tank in an inverted finger bowl
to deter cannibalism. The animals were contained at a constant temperature
of 15o C and were exposed to a 12 hour day/night light regime.
To study the transfer of nematocysts to the cnidosac, the nudibranchs were
fed polyps of the moon jelly Aurelia aurita. Preliminary experiments
showed these prey items to be suitable for these feeding experiments (Renton,
1994). Polyps of Aurelia aurita were supplied from a tank at Cabrillo
Marine Aquarium, San Pedro, California, on 12 x 8 cm Plexiglas blocks. The
polyps were maintained at 15o C in aerated seawater and fed weekly with
freshly hatched Artemia brine shrimp. The twenty nudibranchs were
divided into four treatment groups and a control group each containing four
H. crassicornis. Prior to feeding, the cerata of all nudibranchs,
excluding the control group, were stroked manually with a finger to stimulate
discharge of the resident nematocysts and promote the incorporation of nematocysts
from the prey items.
Individual cerata were simultaneously removed from all the nudibranchs 2,
4, 24, and 48 hours after feeding for ultrastructural evaluation. They were
fixed immediately upon removal using 10% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in Millionigs
phosphate buffer (pH 6.7) for one hour. For the first five minutes, fixation
was carried at room temperature (23o C) after which the specimen bottles
were placed in a 4o C water bath. Following primary fixation, the ceras
were rinsed in 3 x 10 minute changes of phosphate buffer. They were then
secondarily fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in phosphate buffer for one hour.
Excess fixature was removed by rinsing in 3x10 min changes of buffer. After
dehydration with a cold graded ethanol series, the specimens were returned
to room temperature, taken through four fifteen minute changes of 100% ethanol,
two fifteen minute changes of propylene oxide, and then infiltrated with
Spurr resin epoxy (Spurr, 1966) for a period of thirty-six hours. The cerata
were then oriented laterally in flat embedding molds and cured overnight
in a vacuum oven set at 65o C. Thick sections (ca. 0.4 (m) for light microscopy
and thin sections for transmission electron microscopy were prepared using
both glass and diamond knives on either a Porter-Blum MT-2 or a LKB Nova
ultramicrotome. The former were stained with freshly filtered 0.5% (v/v)
toluidine blue in 1% borax, the latter with lead citrate and uranyl acetate.
Bright-field and NIC photomicrographs were taken with Olympus BHS microscope.
Transmission electron micrographs were taken using a JEOL 1200 EX II transmission
electron miscoscope operated at 60 or 80KV.
RESULTS
For sake of brevity, the results from the various light and electron
micrographs with accompanying legends are summerized in figures 1-16.
Figure 1-3.
![[FIG. 1]](fig1.gif)
![[FIG. 2]](fig2.gif)
![[FIG. 3]](fig3.gif)
Color photographs showing the gross morphology and anatomy of Hermissenda
crassicornis (figure 1) and the adult (figure 2) and polyp (figure 3)
phases of its prey, Aurelia aurita.
Figure 4a. c.
![[FIG. 4]a](fig4a.gif)
Schematic drawing of a typical cerata showing the connection of the
digestive diverticula, intermediary tubule, and cnidosa
Figure 4b.
![[FIG. 4b]](fig4b.gif)
High power photograph of a cerata
Figure 5.
![[FIG. 5]](fig5.gif)
Light micrograph showing the longitudinal organization of a cerata of
Hermissenda crassicornis. The structure is a celomic filled sac that
contains a single tubular branch of the digestive diverticula and the cnidosac.
Figure 6.
![[FIG. 6]](fig6.gif)
Light micrograph of the cnidosac of the nudibranch Hermissenda crassicornis.
The cnidosac is found in the apical region of the cerata and is comprised
of a pear-shaped, sack-like structure, approximately 100 microns in diameter
. Nematocysts can be observed as dark structures.
Figure 7.
![[FIG. 7]](fig7.gif)
Light micrograph of an experimentally fed nudibranch showing the presence
of undischarged nematocyts from the consumed Aurelia aurita polyps
in the lumen of a digestive tubule 48 hours after feeding.
Figure 8.
![[FIG. 8]](fig8.gif)
Light micrograph of a transverse section across the intermediary tubule
connecting the digestive diverticulum to the cnidosac. Nematocyst, apparent
as "holes in the section" can be seen within vacuolated cells
of the tubule. The nematocysts appear to be acquired through the process
of phagocytosis.
Figure 9.
![[FIG. 9]](fig9.gif)
Light micrograph of a longitudinal section of the tubule connecting the
cnidosac with the digestive diverticulum.
Figure 10.
![[FIG. 10]](fig10.gif)
Low power transmission electron micrograph of outer mantle epithelium covering
the cnidosac. The epithelium is composed primarily of ciliated and mucous
cells.
Figure 11.
![[FIG. 11]](fig11.gif)
High power transmission electron micrograph of two cilia showing the longitudinal
organization of the microtubule filaments.
Figure 12.
![[FIG. 12]](fig12.gif)
High power transmission electron micrograph of mucous cells showing mucous
at various stages of formation and maturation.
Figure 13.
![[FIG. 13]](fig13.gif)
The cnidosac houses numerous vacuolated cells termed cnidocytes which contain
the nematocysts.
Figure 14.
![[FIG. 14]](fig14.gif)
Each cnidocyte can contain numerous nematocysts
Figures 15 and16.
![[FIG. 15]](fig15.gif)
![[FIG. 16]](fig16.gif)
Transmission electron micrographs showing both transverse and longitudinal
sections across nematocysts in the mature cnidocytes illustrating the typical
ultrastructural architecture with an outer capsule, a harpoon, a tether
and an operculum
Figure 17.
![[FIG. 17]](fig17.gif)
SEM micrograph of outer mantle epithelium showing clumped cilia.
Figure 18.
![[FIG. 18]](fig18.gif)
SEM of cryofractured cnidosac showing the apical region thought to contain
the pore through which the nematocysts are discharged.
Figure 19.
![[FIG. 19]](fig19.gif)
SEM of cryofractured cnidosac showing the nematocysts in the cnidocytes
of the cnidosac.
Figure 20
.
SEM of cryofractured cnidosac showing the various layers comprising the
sac.
DISCUSSION
This is the first ultrastructural study, involving transmission electron
microscopy, to visualize the appropriation of nematocysts by the cnidosac
of a sea-slug from its digested prey. Several studies have described the
gross anatomy and histology of the relevant structures, epithelia and cell
types and in most respects my light micrographs corroborate these earlier
findings.
Light micrographs show the cerata of Hermissenda crassicornis to
be a celomic filled sac that contains a single tubular branch of the digestive
diverticula that communicates apically, via a short ciliated canal, to the
cnidosac. The pear shaped sac houses numerous nematocysts which are contained
in vacuolated cells termed cnidocytes. The entrance of the sac channel is
guarded by a muscular sphincter that can apparently control the passage
of material from the digestive gland. At the apical tip of the sac the muscles
again converge to form another sphincter or opening that communicates to
the exterior and is presumably the route of expulsion of the nematocysts
upon discharge. Light microscope evaluations of the time series of the experimentally
fed organisms showed the presence of undischarged nematocysts from the consumed
Aurelia aurita polyps in the lumen of the digestive tubules of Hermissenda
48 hours after feeding. Transmission electron micrographs of these nematocysts
show that they are now ìacellularî and have been digested away
from the coelenterate cnidocyte in which they were originally retained.
This observation is contrary to the conclusions of Kepner (1943) who noted
no evidence of nematocysts being ingested by the digestive gland of the
ceras of the aeolid sea-slug, Aeolis pilata.
The incorporation of the nematocysts from the gut lumen into the cnidosac
appeared to involve a number of steps. The initial phase of this process
involved the cells lining the base of the tubule connecting the digestive
diverticulum to the cnidosac. Intact nematocysts were observed within these
cells in light micrographs, and, although the structures were removed during
thin sectioning, a peri-nematocyst membrane could be observed delineating
the nematocyst implying that it was of extracellular origin and had been
internalized, presumably by a process such as phagocytosis. Cytoplasmic
vacuolation was observed in these newly formed molluscan cnidocytes, the
degree of which was correlated to their location in the tubule. Thus, the
cells towards the digestive diverticular opening showed the least vacuolation
while those at the proximal end, towards the cnidosac, showed the highest
degree of vacuolation. This progression is interpreted as being indicative
of a process which involves the development of the immature cnidocyte as
it migrates proximally into the lumen of the cnidosac.
Electron micrographs of the nematocysts in the mature cnidocytes of the
cnidosac show the typical ultrastructural architecture with a harpoon, a
tether and an operculum. The similarity between the structure in the prey
and host imply that little or no morphological modification has taken place
during transportation and incorporation into the molluscan cell. It can
be presumed, therefore, that the structures are still capable of discharge
and therefore provide for both a defensive and predatory role in its newly
acquired host.
The mechanisms which allow for the selective incorporation of the nematocyts
by these progenitor cnidocytes in the connecting tubule is unknown at this
time. Presumably, the ciliated cells in the epithelium lining the tubule
and the muscular sphincters guarding the openings of the tubule play major
pivotal roles in this process. Collectively, they could facilitate the directional
movement of fluids from the lumen of the digestive diverticulum into the
cnidosac. However, this alone, cannot account for the selectivity of uptake.
All ultrastructural evidence to date supports the view that the digestion
of the host material in the digestive diverticulum is essentially complete
and that the only structures refractory to digestion are the nematocysts
protected by their hardened capsule shell. If this proposition is true,
then the apparent selectivity shown during cnidocyte incorporation may therefore
be simply due to the removal of all other particles of suitable macromolecular
dimensions and characteristics for phagocytotic uptake. Further studies
involving electron dense markers with comparable dimensions to the nematocysts
are necessary to resolve the issue.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank Dr. T. Douglas whose expertise and technical assistance
were invaluable. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. A. Mason for his extraordinary
patience and support with this project. His talent and skill accompanied
by openness and kindness were an inspiration and a blessing.
CITATIONS
1) Behrens, David. (1980). Pacific Coast Nudibranchs: Guide to the Opisthobrachs
of the Northeastern Pacific. Sea Challengers, Los Osos. 14, 23, 92 pp.
2) Kepner, W.A. (1943). The manipulation of the nematocysts of Pennaria
tiarella by Aeolis pilata. J. Morph. 73, 297-311.
3) Wertheim, A. (1984) The Intertidal Wilderness. Sierra Club Books, San
Francisco. 118 pp.
ABBREVIATIONS USED
CS: Cnidosac
D Digestive Diverticulum
C: Cnidocyte
T: Tubule
H: Harpoon
N: Nematocyst
CI: Cilia
NU: Nucleus
zedmason@csulb.edu