*** Rubric for Evaluating the Electronic Portfolio Developed for ETEC 411

 

Items for Evaluation

Accomplished

 

Developing

 

Beginning

 

Possible points

Points earned

Identification of three Web sites

The summary includes all the required elements (Names, URLs, & descriptions) and demonstrates the candidate’s well-rounded knowledge of using the sites in teaching.

One or two elements are missing from the summary, but it moderately demonstrates the candidate’s knowledge of using the sites in teaching.

More than two elements are missing.  The summary does not provide evidence regarding the candidate’s knowledge about using the sites in teaching.

5

5

3

1

 

Software evaluation

(Basic requirements: The form should be about two pages long with at least 20 evaluation items/ questions, including the four listed on the guidelines.  All the items/ questions should be properly addressed.)

The evaluation meets and exceeds the basic requirements.  The items/ questions and responses included are very useful for teachers to make decisions on software adoption.  The form uses tables and the page layout of the form is creative.

The evaluation meets the basic requirements.  The items/ questions and responses included are meaningful and helpful in making decisions on software adoption.  The form uses at least one table and the page layout is appealing.

The evaluation does not meet the basic requirements.  Most of the items/ questions and responses included are neither meaningful nor helpful in making decisions on software adoption.  The form does not use any table; the page layout is unattractive.

5

5

3

1

 

WebQuests

The narrative demonstrates that the candidate is able to apply all the four criteria listed in the guidelines, select and use a grade-level appropriate WebQuest for effective teaching. The narrative is well-structured and informative.

The narrative demonstrates that the candidate is able to apply at least three of the criteria, select and use a grade-level appropriate WebQuest in teaching.  The narrative is well-structured.

The narrative provides shaky evidence regarding the candidate’s ability to apply the criteria, select or use a grade-level appropriate WebQuest in teaching.  The narrative could be better structured.

10

10

6

3

 

Electronic grade book

The spreadsheet meets and exceeds the basic requirements (at least 20 students and 10 assessment items).  All the calculations are accurate. 

The spreadsheet meets the basic requirements.  Almost all the calculations are accurate.

The spreadsheet does not meet the basic requirements.  Some calculations are not accurate.

10

10

6

3

 

Lesson that integrates Word Processing and the Internet

The lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned well with all the objectives.  Computer technology is used as a tool in the lesson, which effectively integrates Word Processing and the Internet to support learning the subject matters.  Most of the ideas are original.

The lesson plan includes adequate details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional strategies moderately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned with the objectives.  The lesson integrates Word Processing and the Internet to support learning the subject matters. 

The lesson plan does not include sufficient details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are not clear, the instructional strategies poorly support the objectives, and the evaluation is not properly aligned with the objectives.  The lesson does not effectively integrate Word Processing or the Internet to support learning the subject matters. 

10

10

6

3

 

Lesson that accommodates English language learners (ELLs) and integrates multimedia presentation software

 

The lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned well with all the objectives.  Computer technology is used as a tool in the lesson, which effectively integrates presentation software and significantly facilitates the learning of ELLs.

The lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned well with all the objectives.  The lesson integrates presentation software and adequately facilitates the learning of ELLs.

The lesson plan does not include sufficient details for all the basic components in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are not clear, the instructional strategies poorly support the objectives, and the evaluation is not properly aligned with the objectives.  The lesson does not effectively integrate presentation software nor facilitates the learning of ELLs.

10

10

6

3

 

Professional Teacher’s Web page on CSULB Web server:

 

A. Required elements

The Web page includes all the required elements:

·   Name, address, and teaching philosophy

·   At least two links to the candidate’s lesson plans

·   At least six links to resources for students

·   At least one digital photo

The page misses one or two of the required elements.  One or two links are broken.

The page misses more than two elements.  More than two links are broken.

10

10

6

3

 

Professional Teacher’s Web page on CSULB Web server:

 

B. Design

The page has an eye-catching and creative design layout.  The information is well-organized and accurate.  The background significantly compliments the text.

The page has a nice design layout and the information is well-organized and accurate.  The text is easy to read on the background.

The page is boring and the design layout is poor.  The information is unorganized or inaccurate.  The text is difficult to read.

10

10

6

3

 

Portfolio interview

(It is the candidate’s responsibility to make sure that all elements of his/ her electronic portfolio are viewable on the computers in the lab, where the interview takes place.)

By highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the interviewer, the candidate is conversant about the developmental process of the portfolio.

 

By highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the interviewer, the candidate demonstrates adequate knowledge about the developmental process of the portfolio.

 

By highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the interviewer, the candidate can not provide significant evidence that demonstrates his/ her knowledge about the developmental process of the portfolio.

10

10

6

3

 

 

*** Note: Professional presentation, including grammar, spelling, and punctuation, is expected in all required items.   For each grammatical or spelling error, a half point will be deducted from the total points.