*** Rubric for Evaluating the Electronic
Portfolio Developed for ETEC 411
|
Items for Evaluation |
Accomplished |
Developing |
Beginning |
Possible points |
|
Points earned |
||||
|
Identification
of three Web sites |
The
summary includes all the required elements (Names, URLs, & descriptions)
and demonstrates the candidate’s well-rounded knowledge of using the sites in
teaching. |
One or
two elements are missing from the summary, but it moderately demonstrates the
candidate’s knowledge of using the sites in teaching. |
More than
two elements are missing. The summary
does not provide evidence regarding the candidate’s knowledge about using the
sites in teaching. |
5 |
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
Software
evaluation (Basic
requirements: The form should be about two pages long with at least 20 evaluation
items/ questions, including the four listed on the guidelines. All the items/ questions should be properly
addressed.) |
The
evaluation meets and exceeds the basic requirements. The items/ questions and responses included
are very useful for teachers to make decisions on software adoption. The form uses tables and the page layout of
the form is creative. |
The
evaluation meets the basic requirements.
The items/ questions and responses included are meaningful and helpful
in making decisions on software adoption.
The form uses at least one table and the page layout is appealing. |
The
evaluation does not meet the basic requirements. Most of the items/ questions and responses
included are neither meaningful nor helpful in making decisions on software
adoption. The form does not use any
table; the page layout is unattractive. |
5 |
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
WebQuests |
The
narrative demonstrates that the candidate is able to apply all the four
criteria listed in the guidelines, select and use a grade-level appropriate
WebQuest for effective teaching. The narrative is well-structured and
informative. |
The
narrative demonstrates that the candidate is able to apply at least three of
the criteria, select and use a grade-level appropriate WebQuest in teaching. The narrative is well-structured. |
The
narrative provides shaky evidence regarding the candidate’s ability to apply
the criteria, select or use a grade-level appropriate WebQuest in teaching. The narrative could be better structured. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Electronic
grade book |
The spreadsheet
meets and exceeds the basic requirements (at least 20 students and 10
assessment items). All the
calculations are accurate. |
The
spreadsheet meets the basic requirements.
Almost all the calculations are accurate. |
The
spreadsheet does not meet the basic requirements. Some calculations are not accurate. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Lesson
that integrates Word Processing and the Internet |
The
lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the
CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional
strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned
well with all the objectives. Computer
technology is used as a tool in the lesson, which effectively integrates Word
Processing and the Internet to support learning the subject matters. Most of the ideas are original. |
The
lesson plan includes adequate details for all the basic components in the
CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional
strategies moderately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned
with the objectives. The lesson
integrates Word Processing and the Internet to support learning the subject
matters. |
The
lesson plan does not include sufficient details for all the basic components
in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are not clear, the
instructional strategies poorly support the objectives, and the evaluation is
not properly aligned with the objectives.
The lesson does not effectively integrate Word Processing or the Internet
to support learning the subject matters.
|
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Lesson
that accommodates English language learners (ELLs) and integrates multimedia
presentation software |
The
lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the
CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional
strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned
well with all the objectives. Computer
technology is used as a tool in the lesson, which effectively integrates
presentation software and significantly facilitates the learning of ELLs. |
The
lesson plan includes sufficient details for all the basic components in the
CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are clear, the instructional
strategies adequately support the objectives, and the evaluation is aligned
well with all the objectives. The
lesson integrates presentation software and adequately facilitates the
learning of ELLs. |
The
lesson plan does not include sufficient details for all the basic components
in the CLRN lesson plan builder. The objectives are not clear, the
instructional strategies poorly support the objectives, and the evaluation is
not properly aligned with the objectives.
The lesson does not effectively integrate presentation software nor
facilitates the learning of ELLs. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Professional
Teacher’s Web page on CSULB Web server: A.
Required elements |
The Web
page includes all the required elements: ·
Name,
address, and teaching philosophy ·
At
least two links to the candidate’s lesson plans ·
At
least six links to resources for students ·
At
least one digital photo |
The page
misses one or two of the required elements.
One or two links are broken. |
The page
misses more than two elements. More
than two links are broken. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Professional
Teacher’s Web page on CSULB Web server: B.
Design |
The page
has an eye-catching and creative design layout. The information is well-organized and
accurate. The background significantly
compliments the text. |
The page
has a nice design layout and the information is well-organized and
accurate. The text is easy to read on
the background. |
The page
is boring and the design layout is poor.
The information is unorganized or inaccurate. The text is difficult to read. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
Portfolio
interview (It is
the candidate’s responsibility to make sure that all elements of his/ her
electronic portfolio are viewable on the computers in the lab, where the
interview takes place.) |
By
highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the
interviewer, the candidate is conversant about the developmental process of
the portfolio. |
By
highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the
interviewer, the candidate demonstrates adequate knowledge about the
developmental process of the portfolio. |
By
highlighting major components of the portfolio as requested by the
interviewer, the candidate can not provide significant evidence that
demonstrates his/ her knowledge about the developmental process of the
portfolio. |
10 |
|
10 |
6 |
3 |
|
*** Note: Professional
presentation, including grammar, spelling, and punctuation, is expected in all
required items. For each grammatical or
spelling error, a half point will be deducted from the total points.