Note: To receive full credits you
need to show all your work. You may use two pages of notes, tables and a
calculator but no other reference materials. Talking during the exam will be
considered as cheating. Use separate papers if necessary. The exam is exactly 1
and a half hour (no exception).
|
Ratio of Raw Material Allocation |
Raw Material Supply |
||
|
15 |
18 |
21 |
|
|
¨ö |
22,
20, 21 |
21,
19, 20 |
19,
18, 20 |
|
1 |
21,
20, 19 |
23,
24, 22 |
20,
19, 21 |
|
2 |
17,
18, 16 |
21,
11, 20 |
20,
22, 24 |
Dependent
Variable: profit
Sum
of
Source
DF
Squares Mean
Square F Value Pr > F
Model
8
93.1851852
11.6481481
2.54 0.0482
Error
18
82.6666667
4.5925926
Corrected Total
26 175.8518519
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE profit Mean
0.529907
10.75500
2.143034 19.92593
Source
DF
Type I
ratio
2 22.29629630 11.14814815 2.43 0.1166
supply
2
4.96296296
2.48148148
0.54 0.5917
ratio*supply
4
65.92592593
16.48148148
3.59 0.0255
Level of Level of
------------profit-----------
ratio
supply N
Mean
Std Dev
0.5
15
3
21.0000000 1.00000000
0.5
18
3
20.0000000 1.00000000
0.5
21
3
19.0000000 1.00000000
1
15
3
20.0000000 1.00000000
1
18
3
23.0000000 1.00000000
1
21
3
20.0000000 1.00000000
2
15
3
17.0000000 1.00000000
2
18
3
17.3333333 5.50757055
2
21
3
22.0000000 2.00000000
(a) Draw conclusions based on the analysis of variance shown above. Use 0.05 level of the significance
(b)
Identify the two best combinations of Supply and Ratio. Are theses two
combinations significantly different? Use the Tukey procedure
that limits the error rate of all pairwise
comparisons of combinations to be 0.05.
(c)
Mr. Flippantly, the experimenter, made a mistake by fitting an ANOVA
model without interactions and drew a wrong conclusion. Fill in the ANOVA table
that Mr. Flippantly would have. What would be his conclusion?
Sum of
Source
DF
Squares Mean
Square F Value Pr > F
![]()
Model
Error
Corrected Total
(a)
Perform a hypothesis testing for the factor effect. Write the hypotheses
carefully.
(b)
Let sm2
and s2 be population variance for
the factor effect and the error, respectively. Construct 95% confidence
intervals for sm2/s2 and
for s2.
(c)
Using the lower and upper bounds in (b). Construct an approximate 95%
confidence interval for sm2.
|
Week |
Chain |
||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
1-Week |
35 42 35 |
17 30 35 43 |
7 22 15 |
|
2-Week |
30 48 38 26 |
22 28 40 |
12 19 20 23 |
As we have discussed in
class, an appropriate regression model can be written as
![]()
where

The SAS output of the
regression analysis is given below
The
GLM Procedure
Dependent
Variable: sales
Sum of
Source
DF
Squares Mean
Square F Value Pr > F
Model
5
1434.869048
286.973810
4.23 0.0134
Error
15 1018.083333 67.872222
Corrected Total
20 2452.952381
R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE sales Mean
0.584956
29.47320
8.238460
27.95238
Source
DF
Type I
X1
1
0.416017 0.416017 0.01 0.9386
X2
1
1321.142857 1321.142857 19.47 0.0005
X3
1
80.000649
80.000649 1.18 0.2948
X1X2
1
27.523810
27.523810 0.41 0.5338
X1X3
1
5.785714 5.785714 0.09 0.7743
Standard
Parameter
Estimate
Error t
Value Pr > |t|
Intercept
27.87500000
1.81640968
15.35
<.0001
X1
-0.12500000
1.81640968
-0.07
0.9460
X2
8.54166667
2.56879121 3.33 0.0046
X3
2.75000000
2.56879121 1.07 0.3013
X1X2
1.04166667
2.56879121 0.41 0.6908
X1X3
0.75000000
2.56879121 0.29 0.7743
(a)
Write the fitted regression line and calculate the estimated sales for
1-week and chain 2 under the regression model. Also calculate that under the
cell means model. What did you find? Discuss.
(b)
From the output above SAS Output #2, which factor seems to be the most
significant? Write a reduced model with the factor of your choice only and
perform a general linear F-test to see if the reduced model is acceptable.
GOOD LUCK.