Fall 2002 Series
Wednesday, September 4, 2002
3:30 - 4:30 pm
Room PSY 154
Posttraumatic Stress and Depression: What's neuroscience got to do
with it?
Presenter:
Dorie Glover, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor in Residence
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Neuropsychiatric Institute
UCLA
Summary:
Little is known about the time course of human HPA-axis dysregulation
associated with PTSD. Previous studies have shown lower cortisol and
hippocampal volume reductions in individuals with chronic PTSD. Most
studies have been limited by single assessments often conducted years
after the precipitating traumatic event. Thus, it is particularly unclear
whether hippocampal differences precede the trauma and increase risk for
the development of PTSD or are a consequence of trauma exposure and
associated chronic stress. One current project aims to investigate immediate
and long-term HPA-axis activity and its relation to hippocampal size and
morphology in recent-onset trauma. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
will be utilized to measure aspects of the hippocampus. Research subjects
will consist of parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer. This
population is unique because some will develop posttraumatic stress
disorder (PTSD) and/or depression and some will not, but all will undergo
chronic stress during the year that they are followed as their child undergoes
active cancer treatment. As a result, it will be possible to study HPA-axis
activity and hippocampal size and morphology in relation to PTSD or
depression status over time.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Wednesday, September 18, 2002
3:30 - 4:30 pm
Room PSY 154
Early Social Communication Behaviors in Young Siblings of Children
with Autism
Presenter:
Wendy Goldberg, PhD
University of California, Irvine
Summary:
Autism is one of the most prevalent yet least understood developmental
disorders. Recent research points to a genetic component to the etiology
of autism and calls attention to the developmental functioning of other
family
members. The current study examines younger siblings of children with
autism. Observational data are reported on the early social communication
and joint attention behaviors of younger, undiagnosed siblings as compared
to young children with autism and typically developing young children.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Wednesday, October 16, 2002
3:30 - 4:30 pm
Room PSY 154
Mapping the architecture of human kin
recognition systems through patterns of moral sentiments, sexual
aversions, and altruism.
Presenter:
Debra Lieberman, PhD
UC Santa Barbara
Summary:
In every known culture, social life is shaped – at least in part – by
perceptions of and beliefs about kinship. Explicit
categories of kinship may differ from place to place, as well as the lexicon of
kin terms, but everywhere people categorize others as either close kin, distant
kin or nonkin, and target their behavior accordingly. Some of the most
fundamental theories in evolutionary biology claim that
any animal species – including humans – in which close kin interact on a
regular basis should evolve computational mechanisms that allow them to distinguish
genetic relatives from nonrelatives. These mechanisms should be coupled to (at
least) two motivational systems with distinct sets of decision rules and emotive
reactions: one that promotes altruism toward kin, and another that discourages
sex with kin, thereby avoiding the deleterious effects of inbreeding. Such
systems have been identified in a number of species, but little is known about
these systems in humans. How, during development, do people learn which
individuals fall into which kinship category? And what emotions, decision rules,
and moral sentiments do these categories entrain to direct kin-specific
behaviors?
Since we cannot "see" another person’s genes
directly to assess relatedness, the best evolution could
do is to design a mind that detects cues that were reliably correlated with
genetic relatedness in the ancestral past. The focus of my research is on the
nature of the cues – the categories of information – that the mind uses to
recognize siblings. Mechanisms estimating relatedness of a
particular individual based on the presence of these ancestral cues are
hypothesized to output this information to systems guiding motivations to act
altruistically and to deter sexual relations. Accordingly, variations in cues
assessing kinship should affect the calibration of both motivational systems.
This allows the architecture of a sibling recognition
system to be mapped by quantitatively matching individual variation in
opposition to incest and likelihood to act altruistically to individual
variation in developmental parameters that may serve as cues to siblingship
(i.e., coresidence and childhood behaviors such as eating meals together). Using
this logic, it is possible to provide convergent lines of evidence for how
knowledge regarding siblingship is acquired.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Wednesday, October 30, 2002
3:30 - 4:30 pm
Room PSY 154
Relationship Between Ego Identity And Alcohol Use Among College
Students
Presenter:
Julie Stokes, PhD
CSU Fullerton
Summary:
One-hundred and forty-eight university students completed questionnaires
assessing level of alcohol use in terms of quantities, frequencies
(Khavari Alcohol Test), and related problems (Core Alcohol and Drug
Survey (CORE). Ego identity status (EOM-EIS) was also assessed. Diffuse
respondents were significantly more likely to consume alcohol over
their lifetime and within the past year than were foreclosed. Foreclosed
respondents were significantly more likely to consume alcohol more
often within the past 30 days than were diffuse. Foreclosed respondents also
consumed significantly more alcohol weekly than did diffuse. Results
clarify contradiction in other studies investigating identity--alcohol
relation. Suggestions for future research are presented.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Wednesday, November 6, 2002
3:30 - 4:30 pm
Room PSY 154
The Neural Basis of Perceptual and Cognitive Pleasure
Presenter:
Irwin Biederman, PhD
Harold W. Dornsife Professor of Neuroscience
Department of Psychology
University of Southern California
Summary:
Our selection of which movie to see or book to read, whether to stay in a
conversation at a party or freshen our drink, and where to look with our next
fixation is decidedly non random. What controls this selection when an
individual is not hungry, avoiding harm, sexually interested, etc., or engaged
in deliberate search?
And how can this expression of interest be manifested in
real time, at the rate of three visual fixations per second? The surprising
discovery of a gradient of
opiate receptors in cortical areas associated with
perception and cognition may provide the key for understanding the spontaneous
selectivity of perception and thought. This system serves to maximize the rate at
which we acquire new but interpretable information.