Education policy not viable
If the Libertarian Party succeeds in its bid
to appear on the ballots of all 50 states, it will be the first third party
to do so in more than 100 years.
That is not an easy feat and deserves congratulaions.
But the Libertarian Party, specifically
Libertarian Party presidential candidate Harry Browne, has one policy to
which we must take exception.
In formulating his theory on public education,
Browne incorporates the Libertarian idea of abolishing the income tax.
"The most effective way we can improve
education is to repeal the income tax, so that you can afford to educate
your child as you deem best," Browne writes on his website, www.harrybrowne2000.org.
This, according to political science professor
Jay Stevens, includes public higher education. And that means Cal
State Long Beach.
Libertarians "would prefer the private
sector perform most of the functions now provided by government. Yet if
you are a student at CSULB, you attend a government institution, and your
education is highly subsidized by the government," Stevens wrote in an
e-mail interview.
Having the Libertarians involved in the
election is a refreshing change of pace, but anyone who attends CSULB cannot,
in good conscience, support the dismantling of a system in which they participate.
We support the widening of the political
spectrum. We support the Libertarian Party in its quest to become a viable
political party. But in order to win the hearts of the American people,
the party needs to change its tune.
Truly accesible education for all people
has been an American dream since we were founded. We're getting closer
to making that dream a reality, and we certainly don't need to stop now. |