Acoustic testing may harm marine mammals
By Tracy Reynolds
Summer Forty-Niner
California's sea lions and harbor seals
have been the bane of commercial sport fishing in local waters for years,
but a possible solution to this problem has environmentalists and animal
activists up in arms.
Upon the request of several Californian
sport fishing associations, the National Marine Fisheries Service has proposed
field tests of a newly developed underwater acoustical device intended
to frighten off the pinnipeds that annoy fishing boats by stealing catches
and bait. This pulse-powered device is different from previous acoustical
deterrents in that it emits a combination sound and shock wave.
According to the National Marine Fisheries
Service consistency determination report, these tests would be conducted
off the Southern California coast between Long Beach and San Diego. They
would occur over a five-month period, and take place on approximately 325
vessel cruises.
However, the California Coastal Commission,
supported by the National Resources Defense Council and the Human Society
of the United States, has thus far denied the National Marine Fisheries
Service access to Southern California waters for testing this device. According
to the state commission, the proposed tests have the potential to adversely
affect marine mammals, sea turtles and other marine species.
The Commission is also concerned scuba
divers may be at risk. While the National Marine Fisheries Service reassured
divers no testing would be done if a diving flag was spotted, the chance
for human error is too great, according to the state coastal agency.
"Sanctioning the Fisheries Service's tests
at this point would be a violation of the California Coastal Act," said
California Coastal Commission Chairwoman Sara Wan. "They cannot yet prove
the sound/shock waves will not harm the targeted and non-targeted marine
life the Act protects."
"No matter how many fish, sea lions and
harbor seals might steal from anglers, they are still a protected species
in these waters," said National Resources Defense Council spokesman Andrew
Wetzler.
Richard Ayers, an engineering physicist
whose company, Pulsed Power Technologies Inc., located in Spring Valley,
Calif., developed the device, insists that it is safe.
"It's non-lethal and, we believe, non-harmful
to sea lions and harbor seals," Ayers said. "It's certainly better than
shooting these animals, which is what angry fishermen will resort to if
this problem is not addressed."
However, critics of the proposed National
Marine Fisheries Service testing feel insufficient laboratory results are
available to truly determine the safety of these tests. Some feel these
proposed experiments are downright unsafe for marine life.
"We're pretty confident it will cause deafness,"
said Wetzler. "And a deaf sea lion is a dead sea lion."
Protected under the 1972 Marine Mammal
Protection Act, populations of California sea lions and harbor seals have
increased from 80,000 to more than 180,000 during the last decade, according
to the National Marine Fisheries Service. Until 1995, fishermen could kill
animals that specifically targeted their boats or lines. However, in 1995,
federal legislation decreed all marine mammals be protected regardless
of their "bad" habits.
"Sea lion numbers have exploded," said
Rich Hughett, executive director of the Fisherman's Alliance of California.
"They are beginning to ruin a very profitable Californian industry."
According to the National Marine Fisheries
Service, the recreational marine fishing industry is an important economic
asset in California, and estimated to be a $536 million business in Southern
California alone. Anglers lose up to 30 percent of their catches on fishing
"party" boats, the service said. Hence, California fishing associations
have pushed federal legislators to overhaul the Marine Mammal Protection
Act. Congress will weigh the matter later this month.
The California Coastal Commission's ruling
sets up a possible legal confrontation between the state coastal agency
and the federal fisheries service.
"If the National Marine Fisheries Service
pursues its request to test the pulse-powered device in California waters
it may ask the federal Department of Commerce to step in as a mediator,"
said National Marine Fisheries Service representative James Lecky in a
press release. |