Marriage not special right
In his letter in Tuesday's Daily Forty-Niner,
math lecturer John Dougherty asserts that Prop. 22 only "...closes a loophole
in the law that would be used to obtain special rights for a tiny but vocal
segment of the population."
What "loophole" is he writing about?
Article IV of the U.S. Constitution demands
that "Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public
acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state."
The U.S. Constitution is not a "loophole,"
nor will voting "yes" on Proposition 22 settle this issue.
The recognition of same-sex marriages performed
in other states is a constitutional issue that will ultimately be determined
by the Supreme Court, not by Dougherty's voting for Proposition 22.
Dougherty also makes reference to "special
rights" in his letter.
Why is having the same rights as other
Americans a "special right"?
It seems to me that when the government
restricts the right to civil marriage to a special and exclusive segment
of the population, then marriage becomes the "special right" of heterosexuals.
-- Jay Stevens, political science professor |