Contributions mean buying politicians
Anyone who still really believes that politicians
are working for the people should take a look at Gov. Gray Davis' 1999
campaign finance statement. The Los Angeles Times reported that Davis received
a record $13.2 million in contributions last year, much of it from groups
with bills pending in the state Assembly.
In a nonelection year, there is definitely
reason to question whether this kind of political buyoff is an ethical
practice. Even in an election year, there is little justification for a
system that allows the buying of power.
When Davis signed bills into legislation
last year, can we honestly believe that he had our best interest in mind
as he scratched his name along the dotted line? Maybe if we were donors
contributing to Davis' $1.1 million a month in fund raising we could believe
that. But not many of us were.
Essentially, the people of California are
having their interests put aside for the sake of those who can simply buy
the legislative results they want.
Of course, the people who get hurt the
most are those at the lower echelon of society. The governor's largest
campaign contributor during the gubernatorial race was the California prison
guards' union, a group of people who benefit the most from the big business
of for-profit prisons and police repression.
While prison guards brutalize prisoners
and violate most of their basic human rights, Davis looks the other way,
as does the entire system he leads.
Need a light-rail station to serve your
business? Fork over $75,000 to Davis and he will have the taxpayers foot
the bill.
Want to get away with abusing the elderly?
Contribute $20,000 to the Davis war chest and he will veto legislation
that penalizes negligent and delinquent nursing homes.
With Davis taking no stance on any issues
(except those most profitable to his campaign funding) he is willing to
whore himself to anyone who will pitch in a dime. This is called being
a moderate in our democracy.
Traditional donors to Republican power
holders are even shelling out large amounts to buy the governor's favors.
Atlantic Richfield Co. (Arco) contributed
$96,500 last year and now Davis is making statements in support of BP Amoco's
pending merger with Arco. The merger is a bold-faced attempt to create
a monopoly, according to a suit filed by the Federal Trade Commission.
Many West Coast refineries depend on crude
oil from BP, which has already started manipulating prices, the Times reported.
Where is the outcry from the Democratic
Party, to which Davis belongs? Oh, that's right, they have all been bought
off too.
Isn't democracy wonderful? |