VOL. 12, NO. 67
California State University, Long Beach February 2, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Alito Supreme Court nomination bad decision

Molly Stewart


During a “Desperate Housewives” commercial this Sunday, I happened to flip the channel to CNN. Well, more like I accidentally sat on my remote and it landed on that channel.

Anyway, I watched for long enough to learn about a decision that affects everyone in America and I had no clue it was even going on. The news is that the conservative appellate judge, Samuel Alito, has just been confirmed as our nation’s 110th Supreme Court justice.

Why would that fact tear me away from seeing a shirtless Jesse Metcalfe or deciding which housewife is the most anorexic this week? Well, because Alito’s confirmation means his views will impact the future of the Supreme Court’s decisions from now on.

It means that his right-wing, closed-minded beliefs I strongly disagree with will impact my rights.

He is known for being pro-life, pro-religion, anti-immigrant and anti-women. His strong stance against abortion could even overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark abortion case. I don’t want some old, rich, white guy telling me what I can and can’t do to my body.

Alito’s most notable position was in the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where he voted to uphold a part of a Pennsylvania law requiring a woman to notify her husband before obtaining an abortion. This case alone shows Alito takes a pro-life stance on abortion, a view that could endanger every woman’s freedom to choose what happens to her own body.

Is he for real? Why should I have to tell anyone what happens to my uterus? That’s between my doctor and I. Next he’ll make our parents sign a release form before we buy thongs from Victoria’s Secret or condoms at Target.

Come on, we all know what goes on behind closed doors. Accidents happen, but that doesn’t mean women everywhere aren’t entitled to decide whether that drunken one-night stand becomes a needy, smelly, self-absorbed mistake that takes over your life. No, not a boyfriend. I’m talking about a baby.

New Jersey, New York’s ugly stepsister, is known for two things: “The Sopranos” and Alito. He’s an upper middle-class, married Catholic Republican judge who knows nothing about what it’s like to be a woman, so why should he be making decisions that could harm women’s health? When was the last time he got a Brazilian bikini wax, bought a Wonderbra or read Cosmopolitan cover to cover to see the “Top Ten Things Guys Crave in Bed?”

Alito is more likely to be driving a sports utility vehicle, listening to news radio and golfing with his Washington buddies in a hideous pair of plaid pants. It’s not his religion, income or sex that I object, it’s his close-minded views that could hurt me personally.

I want to be able to have an abortion if I happen to find myself in that scary, awful position. The truth is, I am way too selfish and immature to be having a baby at 19. I spend my free time watching reruns of “Beavis and Butthead” and eating Hot Pockets at 1 a.m., not to mention I am horrible with kids. All they ever seem to do is slobber, cry and take your money. Thanks, but I’ll pass.

Alito will be the current court’s eighth male. The nine-member court consists of only one black, one female and no Hispanics.

Isn’t it a little pathetic the people making decisions about our freedom and rights as Americans are all loaded, bloated bureaucrats?

As a woman and citizen of the United States, I feel as if I am entitled under the Constitution to be in charge of my own health. I don’t want that protection to be taken away by Alito or anyone else. Does the court really need another wealthy, middle-aged man who has no idea what it’s like to be a woman or get pregnant deciding the future of a woman’s right to have an abortion?

Why doesn’t Bush nominate an African-American or a Hispanic or a woman judge who has an open mind, will fight for our rights and isn’t another conservative Republican?

The United States is a diverse country, but our highest court isn’t. While our leaders lunch on lobster, we citizens dine at Denny’s. Personally, I’d rather have a moderate, meat-and-potatoes-eating judge who cares more about my opinions than my ovaries.

Molly Stewart is a freshman journalism major.





 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved