VOL. 12, NO. 63
California State University, Long Beach January 26, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Online classes detrimental to student interaction



Sara Tenenbaum



It’s hard to sit through a bad lecture. Your eyes droop, slowly shut and then jerk open. You wish you could be anywhere else but there. As you leave the classroom, thanking the stars above that you don’t have to go back until the weekend has passed, you see a solution to your bad-lecture problems tacked innocently on a bulletin board: Your boring lecture course is being offered ... online!

The number of online courses offered by colleges has risen steadily since 1999, when, according to The Washington Post, a small company called Blackboard — run by a handful of 20-somethings — produced software that would help colleges put courses onto the Internet.

It was a breakthrough; with this technology, universities could expand their student bodies exponentially but avoid the strain that would be placed on their personnel and facilities if these students were to physically attend the college.

It also wouldn’t affect admissions percentages and the amount of financial aid given out by the school, meaning the budget could (theoretically) remain intact.

That was January 1999. Now, seven years later, the Sloan Consortium (a research group associated with New York University’s Sloan School of Business) estimates that about 3 million students take online courses, a number that has been rising roughly 25 percent each year, according to an April 2005 article in The Washington Post.

Generally speaking, there are two kinds of colleges that offer online classes: large universities and those that exist exclusively online. The latter are not my primary concern, because an exclusively online degree often serves adults who are updating skills or continuing their education while also holding a job.

The multitude of online courses being offered by normal colleges is something that I do find disturbing, however. There is a practical reason for these courses to exist. Large state schools often have groups of “distance students” who live too far away to commute to campus.

But, when resident students begin to take online courses because it permits them more time to “do things they like,” then I think that we’re seeing a serious erosion of the meaning and purpose of higher education.

I got the “memorize and regurgitate” method of learning out of my system in high school. College is the time to work on making your thinking more sophisticated, which cannot happen through a class that promotes rote memorization. To grow in the ways intended by higher education requires social interaction. You must learn not just from books and notes, but from people.

I have sometimes learned more from the students than my professors; they ask questions I want answered but never thought to ask, they push my thinking in directions that would have been unfathomable even days before and they force me to realize that even though I thought everyone at the table was a snobby, careless person, I was completely wrong.

The personal interaction offered in a class environment is priceless; no online course, no matter how easy or convenient, could ever provide me with such a rich education.

This is not to say that online classes should be abolished, or that they don’t have a place in higher education. I am able to support myself, thanks to my parents, on only a part-time job; those in other financial situations may find online college to be the perfect solution.

But if you are going to physically and financially commit yourself to higher education, especially a liberal arts education, then shouldn’t you take advantage of the full scope of the college experience?

That means not through a computer screen, but in a classroom. To give that experience up for a few more hours of free time is a horrific waste of time, money and opportunity.

In a world increasingly dominated by technology, full of people who now only communicate through Bluetooth headset or Blackberry e-mail, by text or instant message, college is one of the last times in our lives when constant social interaction is enthusiastically supported.

If we’re going to shirk that privilege in favor of online convenience, then we may as well not go to college at all.

This article originally appeared in The Justice at Brandeis University.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved