VOL. 12, NO. 62
California State University, Long Beach January 25, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

“Boob tube” actually an advantageous tool



Lauren Williams


For the past few months several editorials have been written urging the American public to turn off their TV sets and seek other forms of entertainment. Books, taking a walk and many other enjoyable activities have been offered as solutions to the dilemma of America’s obsession with TV. It was these attacks that prompted me to write this editorial in defense of watching television.

Television has become notorious for rotting the minds of children, luring adults away from intimate conversations or otherwise making us into mindless buffoons. But, what those who criticize television lack to take note of is that television can be an incredible resource for learning. Instead of creating an unintelligent society, many programs are sparking conversations by making huge quantities of information available and enjoyable.

There is a multitude of shows that incorporate learning, and unlike school, can make an uninteresting subject more interesting by adding special effects or vivid demonstrations of a concept.

Entire channels are dedicated to educational programming. The Discovery Channel, the History Channel, National Geographic, Food Network, the Public Broadcasting Station and many other stations allow viewers to gain insight into areas of study they otherwise might never have exposure to.

Many people go to college and only take the general education requirements that are outside their field of study and never have the opportunity to explore other areas of interest. Several people cannot attend college or have not found an academic concentration they are passionate about. Television allows these people to get a glimpse into interesting intellectual topics that would have otherwise been off limits.

Culinary shows allow people to learn how to cook foreign or exotic dishes. TV shows in different languages allow people learning a new language to refine their pronunciation. Most people do not have the income or time available to travel extensively, but television can act as a gate into different cultures, allowing viewers a peek at something they could only have speculated about.

It is true television often embellishes to make stories more interesting, but regardless of whether or not something is an accurate portrayal of real life, it gives people a break from their busy, hectic lives.

Allowing yourself a break is not only permissible, it’s essential. People have to allow themselves a breather every once in a while to be able to maintain the overwhelmingly chaotic schedules we subject ourselves to.

There are many other, more educational ways to relax, but most of them require more energy than we are capable of giving.

Watching television is a passive activity that requires little or no energy. At the end of an excruciating day it can be just what an extremely busy person needs.

This is not an editorial promoting the idea of spending hours in front of the tube. My sole argument is that society has made a mountain out of a molehill. Watching television isn’t a sin or anything close to it.

Rather than lumping all of the programs together and making gratuitous claims about their educational value or the effect they have on our attention spans, they should be treated as individual, independent cases. Television can be divided into sub-categories. Like food or other substances, there is that which allows you to grow and has nutritional value, and then there is junk.

The idea of ridding ourselves of television entirely because there are some trashy, mind numbingly stupid programs is as logical as trying to abolish all food because some foods can be detrimental to our health. The idea is to moderate the amount of television being watched.

Television has allowed us to stay current with the events happening both around the world and close to home. Depriving ourselves from this resource is foolish and would sever an important connection between ourselves and the world around us.
Lauren Williams is a sophomore journalism major and the assistant opinion editor of the Daily Forty-Niner.


 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved