VOL. 12, NO. 108
California State University, Long Beach April 25, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Our View: Daily Forty-Niner responds to Union


From beginning to end, the Union Weekly’s “Our View on Their View” “editorial” spews skewed facts and accuses the Daily Forty-Niner of somehow hiding the truth. The real concealers of the truth are those at the Union Weekly who consistently mix in pieces of fact with fiction in order to get across whatever agenda it has any given week.

Let’s address the accusations one by one.

First, the Union article claims the Forty-Niner is trying to hide the fact that the referendum will pass by a simple majority vote of 50 percent plus one. In reality, this information has been in every single referendum pamphlet passed out by the Daily
Forty-Niner since the referendum’s conception. Any student who knows how to read would have had access to this
information. It is not something the Forty-Niner is trying to hide.

Second, the Union claims the College of Liberal Arts bailed the Forty-Niner out after the failed referendum last year.

In actuality, the College of Liberal Arts donated money to the paper before the referendum. This fact was even cited at the Associated Students Inc. referendum meetings last year. How this managed to escape the attention of the Union members who attended the meeting in person is beyond us.

Third, the Union accuses the Forty-Niner of going through a “loophole” and “bypassing” ASI. As we have said before, the Forty-Niner went through the Student Fee Advisory Committee, the committee in charge of handling student fees.

Let’s pose this question to the students. Which makes more sense: presenting a student fee request to ASI or presenting a student fee request to the Student Fee Advisory Committee?

Fourth, the Union also claims the Forty-Niner is costing students more money by holding a special election that could “easily” have been held in conjunction with the ASI elections. What the Union fails to cite is the Daily Forty-Niner had no jurisdiction over that decision.

In fact, our paper wanted the referendum to be on the same ballot in order to save students’ time and money. However, the decision was made by a subcommittee of the Student Fee Advisory Committee. This subcommittee also wrote and dispersed the voter information that showed arguments for and against the referendum.

Fifth, the Union claims the Forty-Niner has no plan for how the money will be used. Yet the Union specifically mentions part of our plan — a 12-page daily paper.

In reality, the plan has been clearly laid out in every Forty-Niner editorial and referendum pamphlet printed or passed out. In addition, anyone wanting specific information regarding financial reports has been encouraged to call or e-mail the contacts listed in both the paper and the pamphlets.

Better yet, the financial report showing exactly where the money will go is also available at all four poll locations on campus during the vote.

The remaining portion of the Union’s article tries to say the Forty-Niner is undeserving of a student fee. It claims all we do is “sit back” and write irrelevant stories and, in past semesters, used too many U-wire articles.
Never mind the fact national newspapers and other daily college publications routinely run at least 20 to 25 percent wire articles. Using this logic, the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register are non-credible publications.

The Daily Forty-Niner occasionally runs U-wire. However, our focus is and always will be campus news.

We want to let the students of CSULB be the judge of what is relevant and what is not. The Daily Forty-Niner has continually broken many relevant and important stories to the students of this campus.

Anyone who has read the Daily Forty-Niner can probably think of examples, but we’ll give you one anyway. Last semester, we published an article before the Long Beach Press-Telegram and every other publication or broadcast outlet, saying President F. King Alexander had been chosen as the replacement to former CSULB President Robert C. Maxson.

This semester we have given unbiased and full coverage of the student elections. This includes coverage from both sides of the story. A specific example were the accusations to ASI President Jamie Pollock, in which both she and her critic published statements on the opinion page.

When students want truthful, unbiased and consistent coverage of issues affecting them, they turn to the Daily Forty-Niner.

Vote yes today and tomorrow on the 49er and Dig Referendum to increase our capacity to do this.



 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved