VOL. 12, NO. 97

California State University, Long Beach March 29, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Katie Plourd

Managing Editor

Sean Cocca
News Editor


Mellani Lubuag
Asst. News Editor


Starr T. Balmer
City Editor

Joe Serna
Amber Muranaka
Asst. City Editor
s

Brigid McGuire

Diversions Editor


Magnolia Howell
Asst. Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Asst. Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Kyle Cavaness
Asst. Sports Editor

Krystle Ralston
Calendar Editor

Tracy Roman
Photo Editor

Erika Jones
Chief Photographer


Rachel Furlong
Jennifer Frehn
David Whisler

Copy Editors

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistants

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang
Blake Rector
Kristina Price
Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

SAT errors have little effect at CSULB

By Sara Esquivel
Online Forty-Niner
Contributing Writier



Approximately 4,000 high school students nationwide were given erroneous scores after taking the SAT reasoning test, according to the Los Angeles Times; however, providing incorrect SAT scores did not seem to affect admissions at Cal Sate Long Beach.

The College Board announced approximately 4,000 students, less than 2 percent of the students who took the SAT reasoning test in October 2005, received incorrect scores.

According to Susan Platt, director of Testing and Evaluation Services at CSULB, Pearson Educational Measurement, the company responsible for scanning the answer sheets, reported that the answer sheets became moist causing the incorrect test scores.

The College Board said, “The score differences for the vast majority of students was less than 100 points.”
CSULB receives approximately 30,000 first-time freshmen applications and, according to Platt, CSULB had 18 students affected by the incorrect test scores.

“ In our particular campus, fortunately, it has affected very few students,” Platt said.

A first-time freshmen applicant would not really be affected by this error unless the applicant scored below a 550 on the SAT because, according to Platt, the California State University system has deemed a score of 550 on the SAT as college ready.

“ One student out of 18 students was deemed not college readiness material.”

“ We had 19 freshmen applicants for next fall who had scores that were incorrect, most just by ten points,” said Tom Enders, associate vice president of Enrollment Services. “We have rechecked all of these cases and none of them made a difference in their admission decision but all have been corrected in our system. So this had no effect on our prospective students or the campus.”

If the student received a score of 450 on the SAT Reasoning Test and had an incorrect score with a difference of 10 points, then the student would be affected.

“ Only one student received a differential score of 20 points, but even then the student scored a 240 not affecting the student as much,” Platt said.

Even if a first-time freshmen applicant scored below 550 on the SAT, CSULB requires that the student take the English Placement Test or Entry Level Mathematics test to determine placement.

After the error was reported, an investigation was conducted and once the investigation was finalized, Educational Testing Services (ETS), a private non-profit organization that developed and administers the SAT, notified CSULB of the flawed test scores via overnight mail on March 7.

“ There is no reason to be overly concerned,” Platt said.”“The good news is that we were notified and we are making sure that we are taking care of our students.”

The College Board has also begun notifying students who were affected by the incorrect scores and received higher scores. As well as refunding those students’ test registration fees and any other fees associated with sending scores from the October test administration, as stated in its press release.

Likewise, the Office of Admissions at CSULB has begun notifying first-time freshmen applicants about the error. According to the College Board press release this scoring error was a one-time problem that only involved the October 2005 SAT Reasoning Test.

According to Platt, ETS announced that an additional 1,600 answer sheets from the October 2005 SAT are affected, but CSULB is expected to receive word from them soon.


 



 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

....SAT errors have little effect at CSULB
....
Art promotes peace, shows dangers of nuclear arms


....
Student chosen for scholarly internship

...
.
Nov. initiative calls for new tobacco tax

Opinion

....
Our View: Go out and vote, vote (this means you)

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved