VOL. 12, NO. 95

California State University, Long Beach March 27, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Katie Plourd

Managing Editor

Sean Cocca
News Editor


Mellani Lubuag
Asst. News Editor


Starr T. Balmer
City Editor

Joe Serna
Amber Muranaka
Asst. City Editor
s

Brigid McGuire

Diversions Editor


Magnolia Howell
Asst. Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Asst. Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Kyle Cavaness
Asst. Sports Editor

Krystle Ralston
Calendar Editor

Tracy Roman
Photo Editor

Erika Jones
Chief Photographer


Rachel Furlong
Jennifer Frehn
David Whisler

Copy Editors

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistants

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang
Blake Rector
Kristina Price
Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 


Forum
• The Associated Students Inc. hosted a debate Thursday in the Nugget for students to come and hear what their candidates had to say. Tracey Roman / Online Forty-Niner

Candidates convene to deliberate issues

By Mellani Lubuag
Online Forty-Niner
Assistant News Editor



Candidates vying for the executive offices of the Associated Students Inc. gathered last Thursday in the Nugget to respond to questions ranging from accountability and leadership to hot issues such as the proposed recreation center and development of the Puvungna land.

The debate, which allotted equal time for each candidate’s answers, featured questions from the Government
Elections Committee as well as questions from a student audience, which was screened for relevance by the committee. Questions were posed to each candidate including Zaira Tinoco, the only candidate for treasurer, vice presidential incumbent Hironao “Hiro” Okahana, and challengers Juancarlos Mariano and Angelina Ortega.

Presidential incumbent Jamie Pollock and contenders Meckell V. Alexander, Sean Duenser and Shefali Mistry also participated in the debates.

“ It was an opportunity for candidates to answer questions from potential constituents,” said Cortney Ronald, officer of the Government Elections Committee.

She estimated that, at its height, about 50 to 60 students attended throughout the late-afternoon event.

The race for president, the most competitive of the election with four candidates vying for the seat, saw a flare of tempers by some candidates and an open spectrum of responses from radical rhetoric to more diplomatic and optimistic solutions.

Regarding the recreation center, Mistry said that as president she would be representing the students and the decision to have a rec. center or not would be up to them. Mistry also said that she was “completely and totally against” building on the Puvungna burial grounds.

“ I think it’s disrespectful to think you can build over and push aside an entire culture’s views for the sake of financial gain,” Mistry said.

Answering the same questions, Pollock said that recreation centers are becoming a staple of top universities and that if Cal State Long Beach wants to stay competitive, this is the type of facility that will have to be adopted in the future.

“ With that said, the university needs to find alternative methods of funding,” Pollock said. “They cannot put the entire construction of this building on the backs’ of students’— that’s not fair. We can look at corporate sponsorship and other possibilities.”

Pollock also said that she would urge President F. King Alexander to listen and work with the Native American community in regards to Puvungna.

Meckell Alexander, when asked the same questions, said that he was “all for a rec center, all for change, all for improvement,” but not if the sole reason for the center was to play “keepin’ up [with] the Jonses.” He said that support of the rec center should not be based on whether other CSUs have one, but whether the community supports the proposal.

Alexander also said that he was totally against building on Puvungna.

“ If you’ve never been on the end of the opposition, or the under dog, then you’ve never known what it’s like to have to fight for something,” Alexander said.

Duenser, the last candidate to answer the question, called the proposed recreation center a “money pit” and said that what should be supported in its stead are ethnicity and race resource centers.

“ This [the rec center] is the biggest waste of money I’ve ever seen,” Duenser said of the rec center.

Duenser responded strongly against the issue of ASI action over Puvungna.

“ It’s not ours, it’s Native American land and has nothing to do with the school,” Duenser said. “And in either case, the ASI can’t do a damn thing to save Puvungna or develop a Rec Center. It can’t do a damn thing!”
Duenser began shouting before his was told he was out of time.

At the debates’ closing, Duenser proclaimed that a vote for him was a vote to abolish ASI because he said there was nothing that ASI could do that students could not do for themselves. Duenser also said that he otherwise backed the candidacy of Shefali Mistry for president.

The vice presidential debates that preceded the presidential debates were less heated with a series of questions about leadership and experience being posed to candidates. Angelina Ortega, a candidate for vice president, arrived late and missed nearly half the questions.

When asked about his leadership style, vice presidential candidate Mariano said he believed a leader must be able to delegate as well as be willing to get his “hands in the dirt.”

When answering the same question, incumbent Okahana said he drew his leadership style of listening and analyzing from his experience as an international student who did not speak English very well.

“ I come with very strong beliefs, but I’ve learned to listen to what people have to say,” Okahana said.

The only candidate for treasurer, Zaira Tinoco, speaking about student fee increases said that she was very skeptical about the fee but something had to be done about the lack of income.

“ I’ve always been against fee increases imposed by the state,” Tinoco said. “This was the first time that I had to think about a fee increase that was proposed by the ASI and after looking at all the figures and all the options I am very glad that it was brought up to the student jury.”

ASI elections will be held March 27 through March 29.



 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved