VOL. 12, NO. 80

California State University, Long Beach February 28, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Katie Plourd

Managing Editor

Sean Cocca
News Editor


Mellani Lubuag
Asst. News Editor


Starr T. Balmer
City Editor

Joe Serna
Amber Muranaka
Asst. City Editor
s

Brigid McGuire

Diversions Editor


Magnolia Howell
Asst. Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Asst. Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Kyle Cavaness
Asst. Sports Editor

Krystle Ralston
Calendar Editor

Tracy Roman
Photo Editor

Erika Jones
Chief Photographer


Rachel Furlong
Jennifer Frehn
David Whisler

Copy Editors

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistants

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang
Blake Rector
Kristina Price
Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Proposal merges two engineering departments



By Karla Casillas

Online Forty-Niner
Staff Writer



A proposal to merge the chemical engineering and mechanical and aerospace engineering department is designed to provide students a better service and to save money.

The main purpose of this merger is to give students a better service by providing more courses. Larry Jang, professor and chairman of the chemical engineering department, helped write the proposal and said it will benefit students the most and save between $100,000 and $150,000 in the process.

The chemical, and mechanical and aerospace engineering departments have many courses in common. Some of the courses do not differ much and are offered annually — not every semester. Students then have to wait a year to enroll in a course if they did not get into the course any given semester.

The proposal describes a consolidation of classes as a reason for the savings. A consolidation of classes means courses will be available for students of both departments. The courses can be offered every semester without the need for new faculty.

Professors from both departments are qualified to teach both subject areas, according to Jang.

“ It’s more flexible,” Jang said.

For example, both courses have a Thermodynamics I course. The courses can count for both majors and can be offered every semester instead of once a year. Other courses can be consolidated, like Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and elective courses. Students would also have more options when making their schedules.

Another service, according to the proposal, is chemical engineering students would be better “served all day after the merger.”

Mihir Das, a mechanical and aerospace engineering professor, said to his knowledge, the chemical engineering department does not have a secretary or staff in its office, except for maybe a student assistant. With the merger, one office would be available for all students.

Despite the benefits proposed, Jang said he does not expect unanimous consent.

One concern is the chemical engineering department may lose visibility. People may not recognize the existence of the degree program, because the name of the department would be changed. The degree will still be offered, but it would be listed under the new department, Jang said.

This is not really a problem if the program has a separate section within the new department in the catalog of classes, Jang said. That will help it maintain visibility.

“ [The proposal] is to make the college stronger. It doesn’t mean we’re weak,” Jang said.

Chemical engineering has a high quality program and this will make it even better, he said.

Cal State Long Beach is one of three California State Universities that has a chemical engineering program. The other two are Cal Poly Pomona and San Jose State. The merger, if approved, will create new areas of study and make it possible to add more modern classes to the program, Jang said.

Das calls it a sound proposal that will benefit both departments. The main thing is the students, because the proposal directly benefits the programs, he said.

Das thinks the mechanical and aerospace engineering department is the bigger department and can absorb a small department. The mechanical and aerospace engineering department had an annual average of 418 undergraduate majors in the 2004-05 academic year. Chemical engineering had an average of 73.

The merger will not take anything away from the departments. Both departments are accredited by ABET, the accreditor for college and university programs in applied science, computing, engineering and technology, according to ABET’s Web site.

Both have good labs and good names; money will be saved and students would benefit from the changes, Das said.

Hamid Hafazi, chairman of the mechanical and aerospace engineering department, does not have much to say about the proposal because he said it has not been discussed or approved by the faculty, college or university.

Michael K. Mahoney, dean of the College of Engineering, is waiting to hear from both departments before he forms any opinions.

“ It doesn’t mean [the merger] will happen,” Mahoney said. “It’s just a proposal.”

Before the proposal can be approved, both departments need to vote on it. They then recommend it to their college council.

The dean of the college, in this case, Mahoney, then considers the proposal. The final step is the university reviewing it.

Mahoney expects to hear an update within the next month.

 


 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved