VOL. 12, NO. 116

California State University, Long Beach May 9, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Katie Plourd

Managing Editor

Sean Cocca
News Editor


Mellani Lubuag
Asst. News Editor


Starr T. Balmer
City Editor

Joe Serna
Amber Muranaka
Asst. City Editor
s

Brigid McGuire

Diversions Editor


Magnolia Howell
Asst. Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Asst. Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Kyle Cavaness
Asst. Sports Editor

Krystle Ralston
Calendar Editor

Tracy Roman
Photo Editor

Erika Jones
Chief Photographer


Rachel Furlong
Jennifer Frehn
David Whisler

Copy Editors

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistants

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang
Blake Rector
Kristina Price
Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Referendum heightens long standing newspaper rivalry


By Rachel Furlong
Online Forty-Niner
Copy Editor



There has been an ongoing rivalry between the Daily Forty-Niner and the Long Beach Union Weekly for decades. However, it has gained momentum in recent months in the midst of an attempt by the Daily Forty-Niner, in collaboration with Dig magazine, to get a referendum passed that would increase student fees by $4 in order to help fund the two publications.

The growing intensity of the rivalry is apparent in the Feb. 27 editorial published in the Union that said, “Basically, if the campus chooses to give the Daily Forty-Niner a quarter of a million dollars, it would be wasted, paying for piss-poor articles, and a full-time paid staff that is failing to do what we’re doing for free — keeping our paper financially afloat.”
The Daily Forty-Niner published an editorial April 25 in response to the Union.

“ The real concealers of the truth are those at the Union Weekly who consistently mix in pieces of fact with fiction in order to get across whatever agenda it has any given week,” the article said.

Patrick Dooley, editor in chief of the Union, said the rivalry between the two publications started off friendly this year, and became more serious when the referendum came out.

However, the rivalry is nothing new. It dates back to 1977, when a group of students from the Daily Forty-Niner decided to start their own newspaper after journalism department Chairman M.L. Stein decided to turn the publication into a laboratory newspaper, where students would be working on the newspaper under faculty members in a classroom setting. Until then, it had been a student run-newspaper.

“ Before the department took over and made it a lab, students were editors and made all the decisions,” said Debbie Arrington, who was city editor at the Daily Forty-Niner and one of the creators and original editors in chief of the Union. “Then suddenly it became formatted and controlled; there was a teacher in charge of the copy desk.”

Shortly after the department turned the Daily Forty-Niner into a laboratory paper, Arrington and fellow Daily Forty-Niner staff member Jack Shinar decided to start their own, student-run newspaper, which they called the Union.

“ ASI backed us immediately. They felt there should be a student voice countering what the Daily Forty-Niner was doing,” Arrington said. “After it became a lab paper, the Daily Forty-Niner became a faculty voice.”

Shinar said he wanted to start another newspaper on campus because he felt the chairman was taking the department in the wrong direction.

“ I really didn’t approve of the lab concept. It created tinted journalists,” Shinar said.

John Hollon, editor in chief of the Daily Forty-Niner at the time, said the way he sees it, Shinar was unhappy with the Daily
Forty-Niner because he had not gotten the editor position he had applied for.

“ The Union was basically a bunch of disgruntled journalism students lining up with ASI, who were unhappy funding us because they didn’t like what we were writing,” Hollon said.

After getting ASI to agree to help fund the Union, getting approval from the administration and finding an office to work out of,
Arrington and Shinar finally began publishing the Union Weekly the last four weeks of spring 1977.

And the rivalry began.

“ When you have an open and free press, there’s going to be controversy, and there was,” Arrington said.

According to Shinar, the journalism department disapproved of the Union so much that students who wanted to write for them and still fulfill most of their journalism requirements had to write under pseudonyms to avoid being given poor grades by their journalism professors.

Although the rivalry still exists today, the situation has changed considerably since 1977.

In fall 2002, the Daily Forty-Niner went from a department paper to an independent campus newspaper. The Daily Forty-Niner no longer received funding from he department, nor did it restrict writers to journalism majors. For the first time in over 25 years, all students, as well as members of the academic community, were welcome to contribute to the paper without enrolling in a journalism class.

Meanwhile, over the years, the Union has lost the strong support it once had from ASI.

“ The Union is the bastard child of ASI,” said Josh Kaplowitz, who worked on the Union from 2001-05, holding positions such as music editor, entertainment editor and managing editor. “They hate giving us money.”

Kaplowitz said there was definitely a rivalry between the two publications when he worked on the paper, and he remembers participating in verbally bashing the Daily Forty-Niner. However, he said the rivalry was a friendly one.

“ The Union teases, but it’s all in good jest,” Kaplowitz said.

Editor in chief of the Daily Forty-Niner. Jamie Rowe said she thinks the rivalry is one-sided.

“ I don’t let it bother me here, I just let them do their thing and I do my thing,” she said.

Despite the rivalry, both Dooley and Rowe said they think there is enough room on campus for both publications.

Dooley said for the most part, the two newspapers don’t really tread on each other’s turf. One is a daily, one is a weekly, and the content is different.

Kaplowitz said, when he was managing editor of the Union, he did not consider the Daily Forty-Niner to be an economic competitor because the publications were different in terms of content,

“ We didn’t really go after the same ads. They are a little more newspaperish, so they got more local ads, and we got more entertainment ads,” Kaplowitz said.

Rowe said she also feels it is good to have both papers on campus.

“ It’s good to have competition,” Rowe said. “It’s good to have an alternative voice.”


 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved