VOL. 12, NO. 116

California State University, Long Beach May 9, 2006
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Katie Plourd

Managing Editor

Sean Cocca
News Editor


Mellani Lubuag
Asst. News Editor


Starr T. Balmer
City Editor

Joe Serna
Amber Muranaka
Asst. City Editor
s

Brigid McGuire

Diversions Editor


Magnolia Howell
Asst. Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Asst. Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Kyle Cavaness
Asst. Sports Editor

Krystle Ralston
Calendar Editor

Tracy Roman
Photo Editor

Erika Jones
Chief Photographer


Rachel Furlong
Jennifer Frehn
David Whisler

Copy Editors

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistants

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang
Blake Rector
Kristina Price
Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Fee increases to help close salary lag

By Joseph Serna
Online Forty-Niner
Assistant City Editor



The California State University student fee is projected to increase 10 percent every year until at least 2011/12.

By 2011/12, a CSU student would pay a projected annual university fee of $3,984.

“ I think the crux is to get the state legislature to provide more funding,” said Claudia Keith, assistant vice chancellor of Public Affairs.

Though an annual 10 percent hike in student fees is tentative depending on state funding, Keith said, the CSUs have a concurrent five-year plan in line for increasing executive compensation for university faculty and presidents.

Starting in the 2005/06 fiscal year, university presidents are scheduled to get an annual salary increase of 13 percent for five years, according to the CSU Committee of University and Faculty Personnel minutes from Oct. 27 of that year.

The annual five-year, 13 percent raise would help close an almost 50 percent salary lag behind presidents of similar public universities.

Since the CSU Board of Trustees’s Blue Ribbon Committee, reported to the board about the system’s status on executive compensation, the board has given an almost annual raise to CSU presidents.

According to the Blue Ribbon committee that reported to the board of trustees, the CSUs are in the lower tier for faculty and executive compensation.

Altogether, the average CSU president salary has increased 43 percent in those years, from an average salary of $173,189 to $248,858.

The CSU Board of Trustees is trying to align executive compensation for its university’s presidents with those of similar public universities around the country, Keith said.

Except for 2003 and 2004, university presidents have been approved for a salary increase every year from 1998 to 2005.

Student Trustee Corey Jackson asked the committee how such salary adjustments would be funded. The then-Executive
Vice Chancellor Richard West said 35 percent would come from student fees and the rest from other means, according to committee minutes.

“ One doesn’t pay for the other,” Keith said of student fees paying for annual raises for CSU executives.

State university fees have increased 67 percent from 1998 to 2005, from $1,506 to $2,520.

Of the 15 comparable institutions, the average CSU student fee is the lowest.

The cost of living has also increased significantly since 1998, with all items being on average almost 30 percent more expensive, according to the Consumer Price Index for California.

The cost of living has little to do with student tuition, Keith said. She attributes the fee adjustments on the general funding by the state and funding an annual enrollment growth of about 2.5 percent.

State university fees hinge on general funding provided by the state, when state funding is decreased, university fees will increase, Keith said.

California increased its general funding for the CSUs nearly 7 percent from 2005/06 to 2006/07; however the state university fee still increased 8 percent in the same year.

Since 1998, general funding from the state to the CSUs has only decreased in three years.

From the second half of 2005 to 2007, general funding for CSUs is projected to bounce back 12 percent, giving the CSUs more funding than was available in 2002.

However, student fees have continued to rise.

In the three years of decreased state general funding, students expectedly saw dramatic university fee increases.

Yet as state funding has gradually flowed back into the CSUs, its temporary lull being the reason for university fee increases according to Keith, CSU tuition is still rising an average of 8 percent a year. A 10 percent fee increase is projected for the 2007/08 academic year.


 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2006 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved