VOL. LV, NO. 131
California State University, Long Beach August 11, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Children’s cell phones not needed

Elysse James

The rudeness of cell phone users all over campus cause many people to scorn the necessity of this wireless technology.

For students in dorms or apartments who do not want to pay for a house phone when they are rarely home anyway, the cell phone is the perfect convenience.

For parents with teens, the phone provides a link to their child — a way to contact them at all times. But for children under 13, a cell phone is unnecessary.

Children under 13 are still growing and developing. The effects of long-term cell phone use have yet to be seen and still many parents are ignoring these risks to give their children the recognition that comes with having a cell phone to be just like Barbie.

Of all companies to develop phones for these younguns, the Walt Disney Internet Group has taken the lead. Disney and Sprint are joining forces to create phones aimed at preteens.
Kids these days play with cell phones before they learn to walk.

There is the plastic cell phone with ringtones and the candy-containing cell phone, to start children off early in pretending to use the phones their parents constantly use.

Children are no strangers to the use of cell phones, but isn’t giving cell phones to preteens a bit extreme?

These kids are either at school or with their parents. They are under constant supervision. What need do they have for a cell phone? It’s not as though they are out on their own.

Good parents know where they are at all times, and they can always use their friend’s parents’ phones to call Mom or Dad.
While the phones designed for those under 13 include a few cool features like a global positioning service to help parents track their children, the phones aren’t designed to serve their intended purpose.

These phones will only allow children to dial numbers parents have programmed into the phone.

The problem with this feature is that if a child is hurt or in danger, he or she may not be able to get a hold of any of the people on his or her contact list.

Heck, even dialing random numbers may give them a better chance of getting help then simply waiting around for someone to return his or her calls.

We have seen how cell phones disrupt college classrooms to the point that professors routinely include warnings in their syllabi about having a phone go off in class.

Elementary and middle school teachers already have their hands full with their students’ general behavior. Adding a cell phone to the mix is only going to make the general disturbance level rise.

Cell phones for young children, especially phones specifically marketed to that age group, are just a bad idea. Besides, interrupting a game of tag to answer a cell phone is a real nuicance.

Elysse James is a fourth year journalism major.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

.... CSULB's first faculty trustee steps up

....New site provides non-viral STD info

....Researchers hope to stop hacking attempts

....International students fight for on time visas

.... News in a few

Opinion

.... Our view: Jennings' death ushers in new age

.... Clear Channel clueless about what listeners want

.... Juvenile courts should not replace parents

.... Children's cell phones not needed

Diversions

.... Game, set match for X-Box's new tennis game 'Outlaw'

.... Fans rock out to System of a Down at Long Beach Arena

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved