VOL. LV, NO. 122
California State University, Long Beach June 9, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Canadian ‘Chainsaw Massacre’ suspect freely crosses U.S. border

Our view

Just for a moment forget the idyllic Southern California summer lifestyle. That means lose the surfboard, drop the fish taco and toss the Starbucks. Take an imaginary excursion to the northeast and head into the state of Maine, known for its lobster and, more recently, Gregory Despres.

Who is this guy? Despres is a Canadian and a naturalized U.S. citizen. Back in April he did what many do on a daily basis—cross into the States. But what makes Despres extra special and worthy of national attention is that he brought with him a chainsaw covered with a mysterious red substance — later suspected to be blood.

But that’s not all. Despres also sported a hatchet, knife, brass knuckles and a homemade sword. Soviet soldiers in World War II fought the Germans with fewer weapons than that.

If we give Despres the benefit of the doubt, we can assume that maybe, just maybe, the chainsaw was for removal of large trees, the hatchet for tree stumps, the knife for opening cans and the brass knuckles for defense against thieving American misfits.

The sword, however, remains a mystery and anyone who’s seen “Pulp Fiction” knows the power of swords in the hands of pissed-off people.

The story thickens after the customs agents righteously confiscated Despres’ arsenal, detained him for questioning but found no wrongdoing and later released him. They didn’t know that the day before there was a horrific murder in Despres’ hometown of Minto, New Brunswick. What a difference a day makes.

Given Despres’ troubled neighbor-against-neighbor violence record, he was immediately considered a suspect in the Minto case, but of course, was nowhere to be found. He was instead wandering Massachusetts. Potential murder utensils now lost, he was arrested two days after entering the United States.

Under our American laws even Despres, a man entering the United States with a few too many potentially harmful items, could not be detained. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Bill Anthony, Canada-born Despres could not be detained because he is a naturalized U.S. citizen and was not wanted on any criminal charges on the day in question.

Anthony said Despres was kept for two hours and during that time customs agents employed “every conceivable method” to ascertain if Despres had broken any laws in trying to re-enter the country.

This would have never happened in Texas. No one would have allowed a chainsaw-wielding man into the Lone Star State. Refer back to the lessons learned in the “Texas Chainsaw Massacre.” But apparently things are perceived differently in Maine. Granted, the law kept Despres in the clear to cross.

What does this odd incident really tell us though? It points out a curious contradiction in our own methods for safety. If our grandmothers cannot bring sewing kits onto airplanes and the hand-image-conscious cannot bring nail files either, why can Despres enter Maine after being seen with enough materials to contribute to deforestation?

It doesn’t take the sharpest knife in the drawer to realize any flawed logic or inconsistency here.
If someone attempts to sneak potentially dangerous items onto a plane and gets caught, it’s doubtful all foul feelings are lost once the hazardous objects are confiscated.

The would-be-attacker doesn’t happily take his seat afterward. No harm, no foul? No way! Excuse me, flight attendant, all the strangling with airport security made me a bit thirsty, can I have a glass of water?

There should be some kind of procedure for anyone caught carrying multiple potentially harmful items. He or she should not be admitted so easily into the U.S. after confiscation.

It’s as simple as saying that it should not be easy for people to carry weapons into the country, for illegal or legal purposes. If a shipment of knives or guns is coming in, it can’t just be waived through, and neither should a guy with a chainsaw.

Carrying one knife is one thing, but trekking into our country like Paul Bunyan going to chop down the forest, or worse, hurt people, is another.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

.... Few details released bout on-campus shooting

.... Maria Shriver helps create scholarship for females

Opinion

.... Our view: Canadian 'Chainsaw Massacre' suspect freely crosses U.S. border

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved