VOL. LV, NO. 127
California State University, Long Beach July 14, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Fault lies with companies, not downloaders

By Vanessa Stumpf
The California Aggie

DAVIS (U-Wire) — A recent Supreme Court decision targeting the technology that supports illegal file-sharing may soon slim down opportunities for consumers to download music and movies.

The Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision June 27 in MGM Studios v. Grokster, ruling in MGM’s favor. The court cited Grokster’s promotion and aid in the violation of copyrighted materials to its customers.

“One who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright … is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties,” Justice Souter said in last month’s decision.

The court’s decision holds the downloading software responsible for fostering and encouraging illegal actions instead of the individual user.

James Gibson, a professor at the University of Richmond Law School and director of the Intellectual Property Institute, said Grokster lured in some of Napster’s old customers when the company was going down.

Jan Carmikle Dwyer, the UC Davis campus-designated agent for the enforcement of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, and a former attorney and computer programmer, said Grokster was aware of what was going on and didn’t do anything to stop illegal downloading.

Because it is nearly impossible for entertainment studios like MGM to go after individuals partaking in file sharing, the courts are making decisions that effectively put companies such as Grokster out of business.

The case will now go back down to the lower courts, according to Gibson. The local and state courts will assess the damages Grokster will pay to MGM and dozens of other entertainment companies.

According to experts, there are other, non-fiscal, ramifications that are not as tangible which will result from this decision.

“The newly announced inducement theory of copyright liability will fuel a new generation of entertainment industry lawsuits against technology companies,” said Fred von Lohmann, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation in a June 27 press release.

Von Lohmann said while he doesn’t expect too much impact from the verdict at an individual level, because people will continue to download music and burn CDs regardless of copyright laws, he does see career impacts, especially for current college students, in the future.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

.... Fault lies with companies, not downloaders

..... UC supports CSU bid to give education doctorates

.... News in a few

Opinion

.... Our view: Lazy reporting condemns racy game

.... Supreme Court revokes right to property

Diversions

.... Seven must see mainstream summer shows

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved