VOL. LV, NO. 76
California State University, Long Beach February 17, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Jamie Rowe

Managing Editor

Jeanette Prather
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Assistant City Editor

Austin Lewis
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Matt Pearson
Sports Editor

Bradley Zint
Calendar Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Hockey's dilemma viewed with indifference

Hockey has been cancelled. Hearts are breaking across America, but should we care?

The story behind the National Hockey League's (NHL) "labor dispute" is a standard tale of athletic greed. Break out the party hats and laugh at the schmucks who think enough just isn't enough. But don't laugh too hard. There are some folks that are actually getting hurt by this.

The NHL locked out the players on Sept. 15, 2004. The two-word story is salary caps. The league wants team-level salary limits. The limits would give each team no more than $42 million to pay players. Keep in mind, the average team size is slightly less than two dozen people.

Hockey is hard work and the boys on the ice deserve money for their efforts. But nearly $2 million a year? The heartache and belt tightening that comes from such a reduced salary is immense. That's why the players won't settle for being paid slave wages.

Being so poverty-stricken that you can only afford one BMW a year is a pain nobody deserves to suffer. Imagine telling your wife and children that you can't take them to Cancun, Hawaii and the French Riviera this year. The wailing and tears would be unbearable. The strain of not being able to buy custom-made designer clothes for your children, being forced to buy clothes off the rack, would break any father's heart.

This is a serious matter. Recall Latrell Sprewell, the basketball player who wanted to extend his $14.8 million contract. His reason, he said, was that "I've got a family to feed." Who can argue with such a need?

File this in the "no, really, don't be an ass" category.

But the blame is not all on the players. The NHL and owners want these salary caps for a reason. They want to save money.

The money that the league and owners will save is going to be put to excellent use. Expect press releases any day now describing plans for the creation of foundations to support orphans, war widows and kittens.

Rampant humanitarianism will become the norm once the NHL expands into opening soup kitchens and providing scholarships for low-income college students. It's just a matter of getting the money from those greedy players and into the hands of the saints and Schweitzers who run the league.

Jokes aside, there is a group of people who will actually suffer. The people who work at the arenas, the guy driving the Zamboni and even the parking lot attendants will all have a lot less work this season. The workers who support the hockey teams and arenas are the people who don't have a voice.

Ironically, they are the ones who really get hurt. It's a shame that nothing can be done to help.

Join us in laughing at the arrogance of the athletes. The whining and griping from both sides is really quite amusing. Just don't forget that there are some people who are going to deal with hardship because they're caught in the middle of a rich man's tug-of-war.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved