VOL. LV, NO. 73
California State University, Long Beach February 14, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Jamie Rowe

Managing Editor

Jeanette Prather
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Assistant City Editor

Austin Lewis
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Matt Pearson
Sports Editor

Bradley Zint
Calendar Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Bush's Social Security plan waiting to destruct

Social Security is a financial train wreck waiting to happen, and President George W. Bush has a plan to save it. What are the details of the president's plan and how will it affect the government's enormous budget shortfall?

There is the common misconception that under the president's plan for Social Security, individual payees will have the freedom to play the stock market, buying and selling at whim. In reality, Bush's plan calls for individual accounts that will be managed by financial professionals, who are coincidentally major contributors to the Bush campaign. There will be a number of options available with a varied degree of risk/reward potential. The one thing they will all have in common is the enormous cost levied upon them by funds managers.

Currently, 12 percent of an individual's paycheck is deducted in order to finance Social Security benefits for the elderly and to enlarge the Social Security trust fund. The trust fund is currently valued at around $1.5 trillion, and was started in 1983 in order to protect against future shortfalls and shifting demographics.

Bush's plan would take one-third of the current payroll taxes and place it in private accounts. This measure would cost around $4.5 trillion over the next 20 years. In a sense, it is like borrowing on margin in order to invest in stocks.

This amount, 4.5 trillion dollars is a little over half of the national debt, and it is hard to believe that Bush's plan would leave governmental balances in the black. What is hoped for in the plan is unending growth in the stock market. That is certainly unrealistic as infinite growth is not possible within the confines of a closed system with limited resources (ie: America, the world). That brings up the insanity of the global economy that is predicated on somehow sustaining infinite growth with a very visible limit upon available resources to fuel said growth.

Returning to Bush's proposal, it is quite clear that Wall Street will benefit from a sudden infusion of cash provided by private investment accounts. This will probably create a temporary boom in the economy, increasing the size of the already enormous bubble that is waiting to burst. It's hard to estimate the amount of damage that Bush's proposal will do. It will certainly mean a draconian cut in benefits for many of the "values voters" who put the president in office. Increasing the size of the national debt by 50 percent will undoubtedly cause interest rates to rise, and could seriously harm the American economy.

There are other ways to mend Social Security without undermining the entire system. Since Republicans are morally repulsed by the idea of entitlement programs that don't benefit the rich and powerful these solutions are not even being considered. Removing the cap on taxable income for Social Security, which is currently $90,000, would go a long way towards making benefits available to the next generation of retirees. Rescinding Bush's senseless tax cuts for the rich would also do the trick.

In short, there are better solutions to the Social Security problem, but they are not being considered because the incumbents would rather bankrupt the system than save it.

Sterling Harris is a history major at CSULB.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News
 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved