VOL. LV, NO. 71
California State University, Long Beach February 9, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Jamie Rowe

Managing Editor

Jeanette Prather
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Assistant City Editor

Austin Lewis
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Matt Pearson
Sports Editor

Bradley Zint
Calendar Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Schwarzenneger must address spending issues

Let me first say that I like Arnold Schwarzenneger. I think it's great for California to have a kindergarten cop policing what I believe to be a sophomoric, fumbling legislature torn by partisan bickering. Sacramento produces more bad ideas than good ones, most of which eventually find their rightful place as crumpled pieces of paper floating down the Sacramento River.

During the recall election, it seemed very clear to Californians that the Legislature and former Governor Gray Davis had failed us. Change was needed. Cue Schwarzenegger. Backed with an already amazingly successful life story, he entered the spotlight with vision and unprecedented criticism. The Terminator? Detective John Kimble? Sacramento? For some, it didn't add up.

After an initial flare of election promises, earning a substantial portion of the vote and a moderately successful first year in office, the Arnold of today faces his biggest problems and his most scathing criticism.

Of greatest concern to us, the students, are the budget cuts to education and rising tuition. I don't like it, and I'm sure you don't either. But despite our displeasure, the facts remain. Education costs money, but a considerable amount is wasted or misused as it trickles through the hands of the bureaucracy. In fact, according to the State of California Department of Finance, 52 to 55 percent of the State General Fund Budget goes to K-12 and higher education expenses.

Maybe it's because I'm not a math major, but if over half the budget of the world's fifth-largest economy goes to a single large entity, it should be enough. Apparently it's not. I propose the following. Rather than complaining to our government, and specifically, Senator Arnold, about not providing enough money for education, we should investigate how the money currently being distributed is spent. The bureaucratic administrators in charge of our education need a systematic review of where our dollars are going and why. After all, it was not Arnold or even the legislature who said we need a tuition raise. That raise was just a reaction to the education administration lobbying for more money because over half of the budget simply was not enough.

Does anyone else smell greed or mismanagement here?

The question of mismanagement brings me to a second issue that Arnold, a fiscal conservative, fights about continuously with his Democratic majority colleagues. He wants across-the-board budget cuts, meaning nothing is spared. His State of the State Address said California does not have a revenue problem, it has a spending problem. The numbers don't lie. California's revenue increased by $5 billion since last year, and even with that increase it will stay in deficit mode because of problematic laws and formulas in the state budget. This has to be changed.

Arnold believes increasing taxes is not the answer, and that the money needs to be used more efficiently through cuts and "blowing up the boxes" of Sacramento's bureaucracy. This seems the most sensible solution to me, because increasing taxes simply skates around the problem at hand — bad spending.

Arnold vowed to fight special interest groups hurting the people of California. Yet in a manner seemingly against his word, Arnold supports the "special interests" of big business. Why does he do this? I've got some very good reasons. Businesses provide jobs and lots of them. Businesses of all sizes provide work, from the McDonald's Corporation to a little corner store in Belmont Shore. Businesses bring money to the state. Businesses bring people and power to this state. It is because of business that California has the world's fifth-largest economy. Arnold supports that broad category of business because they bring money into the state, not out.

The days ahead will be filled with fascinating political heroism and idiocy from all sides of the political spectrum. I encourage all students to watch the news as the budget gets re-worked into something that hopefully will be the best for California.

Bradley Zint is a second year journalism major and the calendar editor for the Online Forty-Niner.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News
 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved