VOL. LV, NO. 115
California State University, Long Beach May 9, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Jamie Rowe

Managing Editor

Jeanette Prather
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Assistant City Editor

Austin Lewis
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Matt Pearson
Sports Editor

Bradley Zint
Calendar Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Stun guns dangerous in civilian hands

Our view

Tasers and stun guns are available to the public, but they should not be, as they are so much more dangerous than when they were first introduced to police. Now, even armor-piercing bullets are released to the public, available online.

Stun guns used to be a great way to stop criminals without killing them. But, according to a review by Amnesty International, 103 people have died in North America from stun gun shocks.

The company Taser International is now under federal investigation, and police departments are forced to review their use of the product.

After Taser International’s stock prices fell, the company launched a campaign to sell Tasers to private individuals. The company created a smaller but more powerful gun to sell to civilians.

Selling guns to civilians is not a bad idea in and of itself, but selling guns more powerful than those law enforcement carry is definitely a bad idea. Selling powerful Tasers to civilians is also a bad idea.

A young woman alone in a house who keeps a Taser in case of a break-in poses no threat to anyone but the criminal. But putting that same Taser in the hands of the criminal poses a huge threat to everyone, even police.

A Taser in the wrong hands can become a powerful weapon to be used against police or anyone else, or even as a torture weapon.

The documented deaths related to Taser shock have involved people on drugs, with heart conditions and police using other types of violence after the person was stunned. It has not been proven that the stun gun was the main force behind these deaths.

But even if it is not the reason for the death, these stun guns played a part in subduing the individual enough for police to use other kinds of force.

Criminals could also use the guns to stun a victim and then do anything they want. The victim would be unable to stop them.

But according to Taser International, the stun guns are safe and will help civilians stop crime. The company claims Tasers are safer because they are fired from a distance, instead of being up close and personal and stabbing at the person with the weapon.

The company will require civilians who purchase the weapon to register it and be subject to a background check. The company is also installing tracking devices in each weapon.

A tag is released each time the gun is fired, with tiny metal flakes that carry the owner’s information.

Taking the tags out will also disable the dart cartridge.

The information can easily be faked, with fake birth certificates easy to buy on the black market and identity theft still rampant. The tracking devices and background checks are easily avoidable if the individual has the right contacts.

The company has taken these efforts to make the guns a bit safer, but in the wrong hands, even with the tracking devices, stun guns can be extremely dangerous.

And the gun is not much larger than a cell phone. People can carry it secretly and the victim will never know until it hits them.

In addition, the stun gun for civilians produces an effect lasting 10 seconds. If the trigger is pulled more, the stun can last up to 30 seconds.

Police stun guns only last five seconds, which Taser International feels is enough time for police to control someone, while civilians would need a longer time.

Opening these powerful stun guns to civilians makes police have an even harder time of containing possible criminals.

If a police officer and criminal each have a Taser, the one in the hand of the criminal will be more powerful, easier to conceal, and will last longer than the police version.

California’s State Assemblyman Mark Leno has introduced legislation for our state to ban personal Tasers and set up studies to see how dangerous the weapon is.

Hopefully California won’t be the only state to consider the possibilities of allowing this weapon in civilian hands.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Selig needs to make stand against steroids

.... Freshman Kay Hoey qualifies for NCAA Championships in Oregon

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved