VOL. LV, NO. 117
California State University, Long Beach May 11, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Jamie Rowe

Managing Editor

Jeanette Prather
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Assistant City Editor

Austin Lewis
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Matt Pearson
Sports Editor

Bradley Zint
Calendar Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Long Beach reacts to death penalty ruling

By Krystle Ralston
Daily Forty-Niner
Contributing Writer

On March 1 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that executing criminals under the age of 18 is unconstitutional, which allowed 72 inmates who committed crimes as teenagers to cheat death.

The 5-4 vote was justified by explaining that those of young age "are not among the worst offenders" and do not have a firm grasp on the concept of right and wrong. This decision follows yet another ban of execution of those who are mentally retarded, which was overruled in 2002.

The execution of juveniles was decided as "cruel and unusual punishment" under the eighth amendment of the Constitution. Those the decision affects will most likely serve a lifetime in prison.

The first decision made to execute those under 18 was in 1989, which allowed 16 and 17-year-olds to receive the death penalty. In 1988, the United States ruled against having a death penalty for those that were 15 or younger. Sixteen states ruled against it, which caused young people to be tried within the states that it was instated. The United States is the only country that has had a juvenile death penalty.

Cal State Long Beach students have multiple views about the matter.

"I believe that they should be given a chance. We're not helping, not rehabilitating them, we're just throwing them away like yesterday's trash," said freshman nursing student Nikki Laqui.

"What makes us any better than them, they kill, then we kill," said freshman nursing student Rachel Brown. "We are no better or justified in doing the same. I don't think they're really old enough to understand."

Not all students at CSULB are opposed to the idea of a death penalty for the youth. "If they kill because they like to kill, they should be punished for it," said junior Liberal Studies major Leticia Orozco. "Even when you're young, you know what you're doing when you do it. A 17-year-old can be ruthless, and they have their whole lives to keep doing what they're doing."

On the day the ruling was decided, in a news release by the Office of Attorney General Henry McMaster of South Carolina, he said, "While I firmly believe that adult crimes usually deserve adult punishment, the Supreme Court's decision brings clarity to an issue that has conflicted the hearts of many Americans. It is now the law of the land and will be followed as such."

The United Nation's Convention on the Rights of the Child bans the death penalty against minor offenders, and this has been recognized by every country in the world except Somalia and the United States. It can be argued that the country of Somalia has no recognized government, unlike the United States.

In the last decade, the states in the United States that have executed minors were Texas, Oklahoma and Virginia.

The executive director of Amnesty International USA William Schulz said, "Today, the court repudiated the misguided idea that the United States can pledge to leave no child behind while simultaneously exiling children to the death chamber."

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... LBSU Dirtbags avoid sweep with win in series finale

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved