VOL. LV, NO. 187
California State University, Long Beach November 30, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Our View: Two sides to Tookie’s jail tale


The death penalty is a black and white issue capable of destructive polarization to this country. Life or death, which does a convicted man or woman deserve? Such decisions are difficult and endlessly debatable.

Take the case in point: the recently publicized case of Stanley “Tookie” Williams, co-founder of the Crips gang and convicted killer of four.

So then, where does the controversy lie? Where does the gray matter reside in this case of a man convicted of denying four people the right to live, a man who co-started a gang still instigating violence in places like Los Angeles?

Since his incarceration, Williams has changed and is what many could consider a prominent example of the reform capable in America’s prisons. He has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize five times, created peace treaties for the Crips and their rival gang, the Bloods, received the president’s Youth Service Award and even written children’s books with anti-gang messages.

Should this man, now reformed, be granted clemency?

One side believes the death penalty for Williams, despite his apparent reform, is still appropriate. Williams helped start a violent group that has tragically harmed people in the United States.

Additionally, the cries of a racial injustice in the judicial system by some of Williams’ defenders are unjustified. Do they believe only minorities receive capital punishment, or only non-whites become convicted by the system? Saying the system is blatantly racist is another unfair example of the “race card” being pulled.

Williams killed four people, four souls who are no longer living and breathing today. That is reason enough to receive capital punishment. His reform in prison is commendable, exemplary and should be how he is ultimately known in the history books. However, it does not excuse his previous mistakes that may cost him his life Dec. 13.

The other side believes although Williams should be punished for his atrocious crimes, his recent actions toward reversing his offenses have granted him the right to live the rest of his life behind bars. Doing so much for so many even while in prison shows true reform, reform that should grant Williams the course of the rest of his lifetime to continue doing good.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his review of the pleas to save Williams, should take into account Williams’ personal change. Who knows, if Williams is killed prematurely by the capital punishment system, what additional good might he have done in that time to help make right the wrongs he helped start?

To read more about Williams’ situation from groups advocating his clemency, visit Tookie.com and savetookie.org.


.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

....
....

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved