VOL. LV, NO. 176
California State University, Long Beach November 9, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Our View: Genderless word ineffective, superfluous


The feminist movement has a colorful history.

Beginning in the late 1800s, after slavery was abolished, women began fighting for their rights while maintaining an obsequious façade. In the 1920s women became more outspoken, marching down streets, chaining themselves to voting polls and even going to jail for the right to vote.

The era most people associate with feminism may be the notorious 1970s, an era associated with women who burned their bras and did not shave their legs.

Thankfully the struggle and strife our grandmothers and mothers endured was not in vain. Their dream of a nation free of sexual discrimination has largely been realized. Although feminist goals have been accomplished, feminist sentiments still linger within our society and are creating a chasm between the sexes.

An obvious example of feminist beliefs that have become too extreme is the insistence of using the suffix “ -person” at the end of a noun rather than the formerly accepted suffix “-man.” For example, some people dedicated to furthering the advancement of women’s rights insist female legislators be recognized as “congresspeople.”

This may have been an appropriate and necessary demand 50 years ago, when women were not recognized as individuals capable of intellectual contributions. Now, by demanding women be addressed by a word devoid of any gender association, the differences between men and women are highlighted.

The original intention of those fighting for women’s rights was to create a society where women are regarded as intelligent people, equal in every way to men’s capabilities.

These gender-free words are superfluous and do not accomplish anything for women’s rights.

Most people do not associate words with the suffix “-man” as being indicative of one’s gender. They are simply words used to describe someone.

People who persist on recognizing women as different are destroying decades of work our ancestors strove to establish. Our foremothers fought against popular opinion and made huge personal sacrifices to break the gender barriers that fueled the common perception that men and women were fundamentally different and therefore could never be equal.

The trace sexism that remains throughout the country will not be demolished by sexless words.

Those ignorant enough to believe women are incapable of contributions beyond the kitchen will not abandon their archaic beliefs readily.

Other civil rights movements have demonstrated that the most effective tool in changing public opinion is education. By demonstrating women’s capabilities, society’s stragglers will quickly learn to value women more.

Women in the past made huge efforts to make society equal. We should not become zealous and apply feminist ideals in such fervor that we erode the progress made by our ancestors.

Moderation is key to the success of any difficult task. Rather than worry over minutiae, people concerned with the betterment of female existence should focus their concern in more productive, helpful ways.

There are plenty of women in need of some kind of assistance who remain oppressed despite the dramatic changes society has undergone. An example of this lingering oppression is the fact that in a few states women still do not have a right to collect the money they earned from their employers.

Husbands collect their wives paychecks from employers. Also, some men still believe that women should not work outside of the home.

These are serious hindrances keeping our society from becoming entirely equal.

Wasting time and energy on small, insignificant issues is ridiculous and disrespectful toward women who are facing significant challenges due to their gender.



 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

....
....

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved