VOL. LV, NO. 173
California State University, Long Beach November 3, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

President’s new nomination worthy of seat

Sean Cocca


It has only been a few days since President George W. Bush nominated 3rd District Appellate Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. to fill the vacancy on the U.S. Supreme Court that will be created once Justice Sandra Day O’Connor retires. Already the opposition is mounting. All the usual suspects are chiming in like clockwork. Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., said, “Rather than selecting a nominee for the good of the nation and the court, President Bush has picked a nominee whom he hopes will stop the massive hemorrhaging of support on his right wing. This is a nomination based on weakness, not strength.”

Most of the more outspoken members of the Democratic Party echo Sen. Kennedy’s sentiments. Both Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., have expressed their disappointment in Bush’s nomination.

On the other side of the argument are the conservatives and Republicans. It appears the Republicans are nearly unanimous in their support of Alito’s nomination. They are highlighting his qualifications, which, as one may recall, was the cause of most of the controversy surrounding Harriet Miers’ nomination. And he is qualified, maybe more so than any other justice sitting on the bench right now.

He graduated from Princeton with a bachelor’s degree and went on to Yale Law School where he earned his law degree. Then he went on to work as the assistant to the solicitor general of the United States. The solicitor general argues the cases that go before the Supreme Court.

After serving with the solicitor general for four years, he went on to serve as deputy assistant to the attorney general for two years and then became the U.S. attorney for the district of New Jersey.

Finally, he has served on the 3rd District Court of Appeals as a justice for the past 15 years. It should be noted that when George H.W. Bush nominated him to the Court of Appeals in 1990, a democratic Senate majority unanimously confirmed him. Now, 15 years later, the same man is being criticized by a number of Democrats, some of whom confirmed him to the appellate court years before.
       
One major concern Democrats raise is his stance on the landmark Roe v. Wade case. A number of sources have stated Alito is opposed to abortion, which makes sense given his Italian Catholic upbringing.

But I believe the opposition is hyping this issue beyond reasonable levels. Since when, in our country, has a person’s stance on abortion become the be all, end all of a person’s views?  

It is true Samuel Alito is one of the most qualified people to be nominated to sit on the Supreme Court in a long time. But that doesn’t seem to matter to most Democrats.

All they seem to care about is the possible overturning of Roe v. Wade. They call upon images of coat hangers and back-alley abortions that shock and disgust most decent people. But in reality, what would happen if Roe v. Wade were overturned?
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, will that make abortions illegal throughout the United States?

No. Not a chance. 

If Roe v. Wade is overturned the states will be left to decide whether or not abortion should be legal.
I guarantee abortion will never be illegal in California, or any other fairly liberal state for that matter. I do not even think most conservative states would outlaw abortions.

What I do think is too many people make abortion far too big an issue without even thinking through what they tout. Even in the face of his supposed viewpoints, Alito could still take each situation on a case-by-case basis.

Supreme Court justices are not supposed to be ideologues. They are not supposed to be advocates or activists. Their job is to interpret the law. Hardly anyone sitting on the bench now has had the experience interpreting law Alito has, nor has anyone had as much experience in front of the Supreme Court.

The support and opposition for his nomination are falling almost perfectly along party lines. We are in a sad state of affairs when the national dialogue in this country is so broken opposing sides cannot agree on something they agreed on 15 years ago.
People need to stop concentrating on one aspect of Alito and look at the whole picture. He is an excellent choice for the Supreme Court and I support his nomination.

Sean Cocca is a senior journalism major.




 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved