VOL. LV, NO. 169
California State University, Long Beach October 31, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Bible usage incorrect

In the Oct. 25 edition of the Daily Forty-Niner, in the column titled “Bible not valid source for logical reasoning,” Sterling Harris uses arguments in his editorial on the Bible that were laced with typical, unoriginal and ill-thought through slogans.

First, he reads the Bible superficially.  I can’t deal with everything here, but I will mention one thing.  The “four corners” in Acts 10:11 refers to a sheet knit “at the four corners” in Peter’s vision, not flatness of the earth.  Much of Revelation is highly symbollic; 7:1 is one example and therefore should not be read like technical literature.  In context, Revelation 7:1 refers to compass points, not flatness of the earth.  Also, we still talk like this.  If I said, “I traveled to the four corners of the earth,” I would be saying I traveled widely, no flat earth involved.

Secondly, he reflects an attitude of chronological snobbery.  People in ancient times weren’t dumb; they knew virgins didn’t ordinarily get pregnant, and people didn’t normally rise from the dead.  In fact, the apostles were very skeptical of the resurrection at first.  It took some hefty evidence to convince them.

Also, Harris doesn’t acknowledge science originally flourished in a theistic worldview.  Many scientists who have made important contributions were Christians or at least theists attempting to understand the complex order of the designer’s handywork.  Even today, many scientists, faced with the fine-tuned specifications needed for life on earth, are theists.

What is most perplexing, though, is his “reasoning” backing up his obvious emotional disdain for all things Christian.  One howler is this: “Ashlee Thomas has a right to believe whatever she wishes, but she has no right to condemn others based upon her own personal faith.”  Harris criticizes Thomas for using her personal beliefs to correct others, but he is doing the very same thing.  Why is she intolerant when she corrects others, but when Harris corrects others he is just right?

–Rich Bordner, English single subject credential




 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved