VOL. LV, NO. 134
California State University, Long Beach August 29, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Princeton Review analyzes The Beach

Our view

Back in the day when many of us were searching frantically for the perfect college, we consulted the Princeton Review. For those who have not indulged in this handy guide to getting the supposed real scoop from the nation’s campuses, it is a book in which students submit various pieces of information. The result is a general overlook of the campus from its very own student body’s words, as well as other official statistics.

For many years, our glorious campus was not even included in the Princeton Review. To the dismay of those of us who still peruse the latest editions, we were entertained instead by reviews of smaller, perhaps even lesser colleges around the country – top party-ranked schools like Lehigh University in Pennsylvania or even Bradley University located in the Midwest.

But as of last year, CSULB readers of this Princeton publication can read about our very own school. No longer is California’s second-largest campus excluded from this highly-publicized national listing.

But what does this review say about CSULB? What will readers learn upon reading information surveyed from students? Is our survey accurate, stereotypical, or just plain wrong?

In 2004, the CSULB Princeton Review survey appeared to be full of campus stereotypes, which generally were only half-truths. The compilation of student-submitted information did not paint a clear picture of what The Beach was all about.

In 2005, however, the book has been relieved of such incompetence with regards to its portrayal of our university. CSULB is not ranked on any of its national rankings, which include admissions, libraries, dorms and parties to name a few.

The review does, however, touch on both the positive and the things-to-be-improved-upon aspects of our campus.
First some of the good. The review mentions the incredible diversity of our school, parallel to the state of California itself. It quotes that nearly all students can find his or her respective niche in a campus of 35,000 and that there is not a typical student here.

Though given the commuter nature of this campus, it mentions the sad fact that the student community as a whole is not very strong. With students commuting to school and combining other outside commitments, it is hard to get a majority of students to get involved on campus and participate.

But even though much of campus commutes from various parts of the greater area, the Princeton Review does not fail to mention Beach Pride. Every day students can be seen displaying gold and black or sporting Beach gear.

It also mentions our school’s strongest departments: science, engineering, art, communications, music, theater, nursing, nutrition, business and education. Though this listing seems to cover all the bases and said a majority of our school’s majors, it is odd to read the relatively low academic rating to our school (76 out of 99) given the review’s mentioning of its strengths.

In regard to Beach sports, the review referred to our excellent volleyball and baseball programs and the fact that all sports events are free to students.

Another source of campus pride indicated was how aesthetically pleasing our little nook of Long Beach is. In a city, and county for that matter, that is generally developed to the point of being labeled as a concrete jungle, CSULB provides a beautiful escape. Trees and grassy knolls adorn the campus, adding to our further academic comfort here.

The review also noted that the city of Long Beach is in an ideal location, providing both access to hotspots in Los Angeles and Orange counties.

With the massive size of our campus’ student body, the review did not fail to emphasize the occasional headaches students endure while battling the academic bureaucracy. It said impacted majors and administrative tasks can be difficult and while this is certainly true here, the review oddly enough idolized the beauty of Beachboard.

Beachboard has proven to be its own set of both problems and advantages, and while plaudits go out to whoever is making it better, it is still far from perfect and probably shouldn’t even have been mentioned in the Princeton survey.

Lastly for the good stuff, the Quality of Life rating for CSULB was a high 90 out of 99. It appears that students are generally happy here, despite the campus size and parking problems.

The Daily Forty-Niner appreciates Princeton Review’s insightful analysis of CSULB in the 2005 edition.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

.... Students find extra partking at Veterans Stadium

....Campus experiences makeover for fall semester

....Binge drinking decreases by 14.7% at CSULB

....India studies come to Cal State Long Beach

....Bundling leads to high textbook prices

....News in a few

Opinion

.... Our view: Princeton Review analyzes The Beach

.... Don't give me a home where the hippopotami roam

.... CSULB admissions standards for transfer students unfair

Diversions

.... Staind fans enjoy new album at concert in Anaheim

.... Service at the Fantastic Cafe is anything but

.... Every night is college night at Mai Tai Bar

.... 'From F to Phi Beta' mostly helpful for first-time freshmen

Sports

.... Long Beach State upcoming sports events

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved