VOL. LV, NO. 182
California State University, Long Beach November 21, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Court holds Pollock guilty of byline violation

By Daniel Linck Savino
Online Forty-Niner
Staff Writer



In a ruling posted Friday, the Associated Students Judiciary found Associated Students, Inc. President Jamie Pollock guilty of restructuring the executive branch and giving Chief of Staff Robert Godina an unauthorized stipend.

“ President Pollock acted outside the scope of the existing bylaws, and later pushed a failed amendment to reconcile her disregard for the ASI written law,” the ruling said.

The case, filed by student John Kitahara, argued that Pollock’s decision to give Godina an executive-level stipend of $1,322 a month violated AS Bylaws. The bylaws allow executive officers to receive stipends. Determining whether the chief of staff fell under that description played a significant role in the case. Pollock had used the stipend normally reserved for the ASI administrator to pay Godina. Both officers were appointed by Pollock.

Kitahara expressed his satisfaction with the ruling.

“ I’m glad that it turned out the way it did. I got my point across that I wanted to make,” he said. “You can’t work around the bylaws.”

Though the Judiciary ruled against Pollock, it is not immediately clear what, if any, effect that ruling will have on her.

“ The court does recognize the work of the chief of staff but can only acknowledge his monetary compensation after an amendment has been drafted and approved by the Senate and then properly amending our AS Bylaws,” the ruling said.

“ Therefore, until then Mr. Godina as chief of staff should not be receiving an executive stipend.”

Kevin Rhodes, ASI Attorney General and lawyer for Pollock, argued that “should” is not equivalent to “must.”

“ It’s all bark and no bite,” Rhodes said. “It doesn’t require Jamie Pollock to do anything. There is no statement in the entirety of the ruling that gives any form of punishment or recompense.”

The ruling also stated that Administrator Sally Bulquerin “should receive a stipend from hereinafter[sic].”

Stipends for both Bulquerin and Godina were addressed by the AS Senate, which recently revised the Policy on Executive Fellowships. The revision allows both the administrator and chief of staff to receive a stipend. Multiple
attempts to make the bylaw amendment called for in the ruling, however, have repeatedly failed. Those efforts would have reclassified the chief of staff as an “appointed executive officer.”

Rhodes also said because the ruling requires the bylaws to be amended for Godina to be paid, the Judiciary is effectively voiding the fellowship policy.

“ To the best of my knowledge, bylaws are the supreme law of Associated Students,” Rhodes said. “All other rules and policies adopted by AS are secondary to the bylaws. The decision of the Judiciary to declare that ‘until the bylaws are changed, Mr. Godina is not entitled to a stipend’ effectively undoes all of the work done by the Senate on the executive fellowship policy.”

Chief Justice Mandy Reyes said the fellowship policy, though not considered by the court while the ruling was being drafted, effectively solved the problem.

“ When we made this ruling, we were not aware of the amendment that had been made,” she added.

The Judiciary’s ruling also noted deep-rooted problems with the AS Bylaws.

“ We feel that the current AS Bylaws allow for a major inconsistency which both parties failed to mention,” the ruling said. “Hence, the difference between an elected executive officer and an appointed executive officer both fall under the ‘AS Executives’ category.”

The ruling also said the court recommended the AS Senate reconsider and fix the inconsistencies in its functioning rules so future administrations cannot abuse them.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

....
....

News

....Murray State University’s Southern charm

....CSULB clothing subject to fair labor laws

....Court holds Pollock guilty of byline violation

....UC Santa Cruz civil rights activist encourages diversity

....Despite obstacles, parking structure to be built on time to be done on time


Opinion

....
Our View: Horrible grammar detrimental to grades

....Stratification in on-campus gym perplexing

....Hypocrisy in France unfair toward Muslims

....United States censorship methods not effective, useless

....
Black Entertainment Television lacks variety, style

....California special election wasteful, money can be spent elsewhere


Diverisons

....Behrendt’s ‘Uncool’ packed with comedy


Sports


....Lift with your legs not with your knees
....A few oddities in the world of difficult extreme sports

 



 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved