VOL. LV, NO. 168
California State University, Long Beach October 27, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Candidate • F. King Alexander speaks to students as a part of the forums to help the campus community get to know the candidates, held last week. File photo Tracy Roman / Daily Forty-Niner.

It’s good to be King (Alexander, that is)



By Daniel Linck Savino

Online Forty-Niner
Staff Writer


F. King Alexander will be the sixth president of Cal State Long Beach, sources said Wednesday. A lengthy list of candidates had been winnowed to four main candidates in recent weeks. But by the final closed-door meetings of the California State University trustees yesterday, only two candidates remained.

Alexander, president of Murray State University, in Kentucky, and Gary Reichard, provost of CSULB, had their final interviews Wednesday. Both Richard H. Wells of the University of Wisconsin and Wilson G. Bradshaw of Metropolitan State University Minnesota withdrew Wednesday.

Craig Smith, faculty representative on the Board of Trustees and film and electronic arts department chairman at CSULB, said there could be a number of reasons
for their withdrawals.

“ Somtimes they see where the tide is turning,” he said. “Sometimes they get an offer from their campus.”

Pay raises from their home campuses, he noted, were a real possibility, considering the comparatively low salary paid to CSULB's president.

In making the final decision, Smith said, Alexander and Reichard faced straight-forward but significant questions about bringing in funding, coping with CSULB’s continued growth and other issues.

“ The criteria… were pretty clear, and we simply pursued those questions,” Smith said.

He also noted some of the strengths Alexander would bring.

“ He has a sense of funding that is something we’re looking for,” he said.

“ He did a great job in cleaning up the athletic department [at Murray State].”

Also speaking highly of Alexander was Doug Robinson, vice president for Student Services.

“ I think he’ll make an excellent president,” he said. “He is very, very bright. He understands data. He has a commitment to equity and diversity. He will build on Maxson’s foundation.”

Like President Robert C. Maxson, Alexander will stay at CSULB for a significant period of time, according to Robinson.

“ He will spend a minimum of 10 years here,” Robinson said. “That is a pretty good chunk of time. He won’t be in and out.”

In the run-up to yesterday’s vote, information and opinions streamed in from many directions. Representing the diversity of the campus was the Advisory Committee for the Selection of the President, which reported directly to Chancellor Charles B. Reed. Among the members were three faculty, an alumni, a staff member and a student representative. Several academic administrators from the region were also involved.

Charles Noble, one of the faculty representatives and chairman of the political science department, described the committee’s role.

“ We participated directly in choosing who would come to campus,” he said.

They helped screen the candidates, but did not vote on the final choice.

“ The trustees were listening to a number of different constituencies, not just the advisory committee,” he said. “The way we got input in the end was each of us spoke individually to Chancellor Reed.”

“ They never really asked the advisory committee to choose the president,” he added.

The choice of Alexander, though, was at slight odds with the general feelings of the committee yet in keeping with tradition.
No CSU provost has been promoted to the position of president in recent memory, Noble said.

“ I think that often the people who chose presidents have something like a CEO in mind, someone who can run a campus from the top down,” he said.

With an “insider,” a significant worry is that they are too connected to people to effectively run the campus, he said.

Reichard, to his credit, though giving basis to that concern, received high marks from the campus.

“ The support on the search committee for Reichard reflected strong support on campus for Reichard,” Noble said.”“The large majority of faculty who contacted me expressed support for Reichard.”

“ I know there was strong support on the advisory committee for Reichard,” he added. “I know that for a fact.”

The committee members spoke individually to Reed recently, conveying that support.

Reed will officially announce the new president this morning at the chancellor’s office.


Jamie Rowe and Joseph Serna contributed to this article.


 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2005 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved