VOL. LV, NO. 144
California State University, Long Beach September 15, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Nostrils can detect stimuli independently

By Stephanie Lam
Daily Californian

BERKELEY (U-Wire)—As a rule, human beings are born with a pair of eyes, a pair of ears and a pair of nostrils. With both vision and hearing, the doubled sensory organs serve to localize or pinpoint the specific stimuli perceived, and as researchers from UC Berkeley are discovering, the two nostrils may play a similar role.

Jess Porter, a graduate student in Berkeley’s biophysics program, associate psychology professor Noam Sobel, and senior scientist Rehan Khan of the psychology department recently performed a study along with undergraduate student Tarini Anand and graduate student Brad Johnson of the bioengineering department, that showed the nose is able to differentiate between smells entering the left and the right nostrils.

The study involved working with volunteers, to see if they could identify from which nostril the smells were coming from. Donning a mask Porter helped design, which contained a divider to separate between left and right nostrils, volunteers were presented with an odor in one of the compartments, and asked to identify which side it came from, with reasonable success.

Magnetic resonance images of the participants’ brains also revealed corresponding brain activity between which nostril smelled the odor, and where in the brain the information would be processed.

“We saw that in certain regions greater oxygen would be used while volunteers were participating in the task, suggesting that the activity involved that region of the brain,” Porter said. “Across all these regions, the activation is higher when the subject is correct, confirming that these regions were involved in doing that job.”

Because odors often have a component of touch as well as smell, like the stinging sensation that accompanies the ammonia odor, the researchers used both trigeminal smells, or smells that had such touch sensations, and pure olfactants, or smells that lacked the touch sensations.

In the future, Porter and Sobel will examine whether the brain is still able to localize odors when placed in a natural setting.

“This is still really a far cry from bloodhound tracking. That’s too overstating. This is a brain mechanism that shows a possible area in the brain that serves as doing left or right localization,” Porter said.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

.... Scholarship helps students' research

.... East coast woman goes on McDiet, loses weight

....Nostrils can detect stimuli independently

.... Hurricane Katrina Disaster Relief Information

....News in a few

Opinion

.... Our view: Government should financially plan

.... College life refreshing, liberating - no rules

.... Societal perceptions of tattoos changing - ink up

Diversions

....Thumbsucker' a strange but tasty treat for audiences

....'Proof' that good drama requires an analytical mind

....Other movies being released this weekend


Sports

....Beach Scoreboard

....Saints slightly restore spirit to New Orleans with win

....Rice retires from football a legend

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved