VOL. LV, NO. 161

California State University, Long Beach October 17, 2005
.
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Jamie Rowe
Editor in Chief

Austin Lewis
Managing Editor

JENNIFER FREHN
News Editor


STARR T. BALMER
City Editor

Lesley Nickus
Diversions Editor

Bradley Zint
Opinion Editor

Lauren Williams
Assistant Opinion Editor

Kim Oswell

Sports Editor

Brigid McGuire
Calendar Editor

TRACEY ROMAN
Photo Editor

ELYSSE JAMES
Copy Editor

DAVID WHISLER
Copy Editor

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant to the General Manager

Jovanna Rosado
Advertising Representative

Sara Watanasirisuk
Gynneth
Harper
Daisy Cisneros
Stacy Hopper

Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk
Sarah Leavitt
Production Assistant

Gia Marie Trovela

Web Assistant

Lin Jay Wang

Circulation Staff

 

 

. News  
 

Clothing sizes changed over past decades; labels deceptive

By Sara Chinchilla
Online Forty-Niner
Contributing Writer



In the irrational world of women’s clothing, size is a vague concept. Manufacturers and designers all have their own very different, very individual sizing rules. One designer’s size 4 may be bigger than another’s size 12 and visa versa, another’s large is minuscule in comparison. All over the country, women dread trying on clothes, finding they no longer fit into the size 6 they had once been able to. Designers play mind-games as they label clothes to their liking, destroying the shopping experience for hundreds of women.

In pre-industrial times, women made clothes at home or had them made by professional tailors or dressmakers who would take individual measurements of every single customer. During World War II, the demand for military uniforms compelled the garment industry to change the way clothes were made and, in order to meet the high demand, standard sizes were introduced, allowing the industry to mass produce ready-to-wear military uniforms.

This sparked a revolution. The clothing industry moved to create size standards for women. At the request of the Mail Order Association of America (MOAA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted a comprehensive study of womens’ measurements, creating a standard. Major department stores like Sears and Roebuck and Montgomery Ward quickly picked up on this commercial standard and began labeling their mass-produced products. Women now had a convenient and affordable way to obtain up-to-date fashion items that could easily be replaced as styles changed.

As the once coveted hourglass body-shape began to vanish, manufacturers and designers discovered the advantage of appealing to womens’ vanity.

Each began to create his or her own unique and subjective sizing system, creating bigger clothes labeled with smaller sizes. Women found themselves wearing smaller sizes as their bodies continued to change.

Finally, in 1983 the Department of Commerce withdrew the official standard for womens’ clothing. The clothing market became saturated with a diversity of sizing standards. Sizes continued to vary from designer to designer and now they even vary within the same company. It was a free for all.

Today, more than ever, the vanity sizing effects designers and manufacturers created is more apparent. The average woman is no longer 5 feet 2 inches and 129 pounds; today she is about 5 feet 8 inches and weighs about 144 pounds. Clothes are still made based on the assumption that women’s bodies are hourglass in nature when, in fact, women are now more pear-shaped, with hips wider than their shoulders.

Designers continue to strive to make their customers feel good, in hopes that if they feel good they will spend more. They label their clothes to make sure that when women shop they pick up clothes at least one size smaller than their actual size knowing that will make them happy.

Designers make sure women are not faced with one of their worst nightmares, having to whisper to the sales clerk, “It doesn’t fit, do you have this in a bigger size.”




 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

....Clothing sizes changed over past decades; labels deceptive

....‘Domino’ fails to live up to real life of bounty hunter/model


Sports

....
Bring back LBSU’s ‘Go Beach’ football spirit and pride

....Instant replay a necesity for baseball disputes to be accurate


 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved