VOL. LIV, NO. 122
California State University, Long Beach June 10, 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Trent Loomis
Managing Editor


Jamie Rowe
City Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Tracey Roman
Photo Editor

Jon Cook
Sports Photographer

Joe Cho
News Photographer

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager


J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

. News  
 

CSULB changes payment methods

By Ryan Silveira
Online Forty-Niner

Cal State Long Beach started phasing out credit card charges by June 1, 2004 which forces students to rely on more direct, up-front forms of payment beginning in summer.

The credit card ban was a result of a projected forecast that the school would lose a hefty amount of money in credit transaction fees by spring 2005.

Although the decision is bound to have a huge impact on the students CSULB will be saving hundreds of thousands of dollars by discontinuing credit card use.

"These fees started small, which is why it was never a problem, but it is projected that $800,000 could be lost through credit card processing by the end of next year," Nancy Eckhous said. Eckhous, CSULB's bursar, moniters and manages the university's flow of money. "Before the money reaches the university it goes through many hands. What it ultimately comes down to is that the university loses two percent of its revenue during the process."

The fact that the California education system is in a budget crisis places a huge strain on the school. With classes and faculty being cut to compensate for the decreased budget, the school has to save money wherever it can.

"When credit cards began being used 10 years ago the estimated loss by front end processors was about $100,000," Eckhous said. "It's more than quadruple that amount now, and it's only going to get worse."

The areas of the university where credit cards will be banned are, enrollment services, the cashier's office, the housing office or any other university department that is not a private enterprise. The Bookstore is one of the places on campus that will still accept credit card transactions.

Alternative forms of payment

The university will still allow the use of cash and checks. In addition, the university is adding three new forms of payment. Debit cards and E-checks will be authorized for use by the end of March.
• Debit Cards: Students can use ATM cards in person, but will not be able to use ATM charge cards, which are debit cards that work like charge cards and usually contain a Visa or MasterCard logo.
• SmartPay: This is housed through CASHNet, which is a company that takes the burden of handling credit transactions off of the producer. This allows students the option to pay by credit card. Students who choose this form of payment must pay an extra 2.9 percent service fee. This fee covers the costs of the services associated with CASHNet. Visa is the only major credit card that cannot be used with SmartPay.
• Electronic Check (E-check): This works like a paper check except that it can be applied to the Internet. This means students can pay by check without the hassle of going to the cashier's office.

The effect on students

The university's decision is bound to have an impact on students as an estimated two-thirds use credit cards to pay for university-related expenses.

"I understand why the school is doing what they are doing. It just makes paying for things more of a problem, especially since it can be hard to come up with large sums of money at one time," said sophomore Kelsey Wadman, who relies heavily on credit to make her housing payments. "If it wasn't for credit, I wouldn't be able to pay for my housing next year."

"A lot of people rely on credit cards these days. The things I do pay for, I pay for with my ATM charge card," said freshman Scott Abling.

Although the changes could inconvenience students, the university is still offering alternatives for those who cannot pay large cash sums in full.

"The university will still continue to offer installment plans, short-term loans and book loans," according to a diagnostic handout received by the Associated Students, Inc.

Some reports may lead students and faculty to believe that the A.S.I. had an active decision regarding the change with credit cards. The A.S.I., however, maintain that they had no say in the matter.

"It was never A.S.I.'s decision to [change the policy on] credit cards, it was the university's decision. All that the [representatives for the university] did was come to the Senate meeting to let A.S.I. know," vice president of A.S.I. at the time, Guido Piotti, said.The matter was presented to A.S.I. so they would be aware of the decision the university made. Ideally, A.S.I. would then relay that information out to the students.

"[A.S.I.] has no control over this, and yes, it is final. However, if the university didn't do this, it would have to balance the budget by eliminating classes," Piotti said.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved