VOL. LIV, NO. 121
California State University, Long Beach June 3 , 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Trent Loomis
Managing Editor


Jamie Rowe
City Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Tracey Roman
Photo Editor

Jon Cook
Sports Photographer

Joe Cho
News Photographer

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager


J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

. News  
 

School supports prison program

By Amy O'Bryant
Online Forty-Niner

The Prison Industry Authority (PIA), a state prison-operated organization that produces a large variety of products to sell to state agencies, provides Cal State Long Beach with office furniture at the students' expense.

According to PIA chief of public affairs, Frank Losco, the organization has at least 55 separate industries that operate at 32 institutions, with 95 percent of the products sold to state institutions. Roughly half of that 95 percent goes back into the prison system in the form of clothing and food products. The rest is sold to state facilities that are required by law to buy these products.

State mandate requires CSULB and other state universities to purchase these items PIA produces, even if the items are available elsewhere for less.
Kathy Bishop, a purchasing agent at CSULB, says the school must buy a chair from the Prison Industry Authority, even if a comparable chair exists at Office Depot for a fraction of the cost.

Office Depot can also deliver items in stock within 24 hours, Bishop says. The government agency can't guarantee a delivery date, but usually delivers the items in three to four weeks if it's in stock. Products are considered "custom" if they don't meet prison measurements or conditions for stock items, and can then take six to eight weeks or longer.

If the prison organization does not stock the item and cannot custom make something, a waiver must be filed by the purchasing department explaining why something must be purchased elsewhere. As an example, Bishop says someone needed a filing cabinet to fit under a workspace that was not made by the PIA and so it did not have the same measurements. She says the organization refused to honor the waiver because any standard workspace would accommodate one of their inmate-assembled file cabinets.

The university has a plethora of literature designed to avoid creating the appearance of a monopoly. The CSULB purchasing operations manual clearly states several requirements for procurement transactions including a pledge to protect the public from the misuse of state funds, to prevent favoritism, fraud and corruption in the awarding of state governments and to provide all qualified bidders with a fair opportunity to enter the bidding process, thereby stimulating competition in a manner conducive to sound business practices and state fiscal policies.

Losco explains that this is precisely the reason for the variety of industries in the PIA. The diversity is intentional, he says, so there is no substantive impact on other businesses.

When asked about the discrepancy between the prices of prison-produced items and comparable products by other companies, Losco points out those inmate-produced products are often more solidly built and carry a much longer warranty than others. He also asserts that prices are competitive, and free of tax and transportation fees, while admitting that it is expensive to maintain a prison workforce.

Costs for security and training are added to the price of the product. Plants must be shut down periodically for various reasons, and people and tools need to be counted. But the bulk of the workforce comes very cheap. Prisoners make between 30 cents and 95 cents per hour, before deductions. Many pay 30 percent of that toward court-ordered fines plus a 10 percent administrative fee. An average day's work usually nets less than the cost of a pack of cigarettes.

Despite the lack of wages, prisoners line up for PIA assignments. In addition to the wages, inmates may deduct one day from their sentence for every day worked, which may help account for their apparent enthusiasm.

A 1996 UC Berkeley study found that the PIA helped the state economy by providing jobs and by purchasing materials from within the state. "They want to keep all the money in the state," Bishop said.

Considering the state's current economic crisis, this seems prudent. But should students be paying so the state can save? Candace Sagehorn, associate budget director at CSULB says that student fees go into the general allocation fund. Bishop says the general fund is used for PIA expenditures. Therefore, students are paying a premium for classroom, office and dorm furniture that the university could acquire much cheaper, if not for the mandate. This is happening simultaneously with a plan to decrease student services and increase all student fees.

Losco makes a good argument that the PIA keeps inmates busy and gives them viable skills they can use upon release from prison. But the contract between the organization and the state university system could be holding the students' money prisoner and punishing the very people the state depends on for its future.

 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved