VOL. LIV, NO. 126
California State University, Long Beach July 8, 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Trent Loomis
Managing Editor


Jamie Rowe
City Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Tracey Roman
Photo Editor

Jon Cook
Sports Photographer

Joe Cho
News Photographer

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager


J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

. News  
 

Photo by Jonathan Hession/Buena Vista Pictures

Keira Knightley stars as Guinevere in Antoine Fuqua's "King Arthur," a unique take on the classic tale.

 

Modern take on classic legend

By Jamie Rowe
Daily Forty-Niner

Battle scenes with awesome weaponry galore and a scantily clad, hot chick frolicking around make for a testosterone filled movie-going experience at King Arthur.

Gentlemen, this is a perfect movie to take your girlfriend to see. While she's drooling over Arthur and his knights, you can stare at Guinevere's (Kiera Knightley) taped up chest all you want. Clive Owen (Arthur), Ioan Gruffudd (Lancelot), Mads Mikkelsen (Tristan), Joel Edgerton (Gawain), Hugh Dancy (Galahad), Ray Winstone (Bors), and Ray Stevenson (Dagonet) all play hunky knights fighting for their freedom and the freedom of Britiannia.

The battle scenes are somewhat fake looking, much like what one would see on WWE; however, the warrior skills of the Knights, Guinevere, and the English are very impressive. The injuries may look fake, but the overall strategies and skills of the fighters well make up for the lack of good stunt acting.

The movie leaves behind the traditional tale of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table. It attempts to paint a historically accurate portrait of the legend's origins, but makes more historical mistakes in the process. The knights are actually slaves of the Roman Empire, Guinevere is a tortured prisoner of a favored Roman family and the Lady of the Lake is nonexistent.

Yet this makes the movie stronger and more interesting. The characters have more internal conflict and speak their minds about religion and freedom.

The end is a miserable and major disappointment. It seems the director, Antoine Fuqua, just wanted to end it all. There are some unexplained parts, which may leave the viewer feeling frustrated and baffled. Aside from these flaws this movie is a great way to escape into the past and enter the fantasyland of ancient Britain. I give this movie three licks out of four for its level of deliciousness.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved