VOL. LIV, NO. 117
California State University, Long Beach May 12, 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jeff Overley
Opinion Editor

Trent Loomis
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jon Cook
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Jennie Lessel
Production Staff


Lego Hartanto
Webmaster

 

. News  
 

Our View: No drinking in baseball?

Imagine a sunny Saturday afternoon at the old ballpark.

Friends and family arrive a few hours prior to game time and gather in the parking lot to barbecue, drink beer, talk and play catch. Sounds great, right? Sounds as American as mom and apple pie, right? Too bad it’s illegal.

The Anaheim Police Department has begun a crackdown on drinking alcohol while tailgating at Edison Field, the Angels’ home stadium. In doing so, it is employing a city law that prohibits the consumption of alcohol on city streets and parking lots. While the city has used the law to punish drinking while tailgating for some time, ticketing this year has more than tripled when compared with the same time period last year, the Orange County Register reported.

The rationale seems well intentioned enough. With crowds swelling at Angels’ games since they claimed the World Series crown in 2002, police and city officials have become concerned about an increase in alcohol induced rowdiness. In addition to potential violence, officials say that nearly all incidents of fans running onto the field involve alcohol.

But the law is nonetheless an aberration that makes a hallmark aspect of the national pastime illegal. First, very few people care if someone runs onto the field. That person may be regarded as a fool, but the actions of that fool are almost exclusively victimless.

There was, of course, the high profile incident last year when a father-son duo charged onto the field and attacked Kansas City Royals first base coach Tom Gamboa. But that was an inarguably anomalous occurrence. Two violent fans out of millions of peaceful fans that attend Major League Baseball games on an annual basis do not equate to a problem that warrants a policy change.

More important is the idea that such a law will prevent violent disagreement between inebriated fans of opposing sides, an idea that is logically flawed.

Among several reasons that the law will not have its desired effect, the most prominent is the misconception that prohibiting drinking in a parking lot will prevent fans from drinking before entering the ballpark. Those who want to indulge will simply drink at a bar or at home or at a friend’s house before leaving for the game. And the violent drinkers among us will thus still have their tonic.

In the event that the crackdown does in fact lead to small reduction in drunken violence among sports fans, it will still amount to a burning down of one’s house in order to kill a few cockroaches. It will accomplish very little save crippling a wonderful piece of America’s leisure time.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved