VOL. LIV, NO. 106
California State University, Long Beach April 22, 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jeff Overley
Opinion Editor

Trent Loomis
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jon Cook
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Jennie Lessel
Production Staff


Lego Hartanto
Webmaster

 

. News  
 

Our View: Nice cars can save the planet

The Union of Concerned Scientists on Monday said that technology already exists to reduce automobile emissions of greenhouse gases. The scientists urged expansion of hybrid vehicles and other energy-conserving automobile techonology.

Not surprisingly, however, the automotive industry immediately decried the statement, saying that facts speak against the recommendation of the scientists. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers spokesman Charles Territo noted that consumers have shunned the current selection of fuel-efficient cars -- cars that use technology the industry invested billions of dollars to produce.

Territo's claim is accurate; according to The Associated Press, less than 2 percent of vehicles sold in California last year get more than 30 miles per gallon. But it is unlikely that buyers have some kind of abstract fear of gasoline-electric hybrids.

The real problem is that automakers make fuel-efficient vehicles unattractive. For all its economical sense, the newest fleet of clean-burning cars has very little fashion sense.

Consumer Reports' top-rated small car in fuel economy, the Honda Insight, averages 51 miles per gallon. We think the figure would be lower if the hideous painted rear wheel covers didn't cut down on wind resistance.

Toyota added flashy taillights to its 2004 Prius, the car rated second by Consumer Reports, thus creating created the world's shiniest egg that gets 46 miles per gallon.

The top-rated American-made car, the Chevrolet Cavalier, came in at number 12, getting 26 miles per gallon. It effectively combines mediocre small car fuel economy with uninspired American design.

The industry's biggest mistake is trying to maximize the fuel-efficiency of its hybrids by cramming energy-efficient engines into minute little pods. By simply installing the cleaner burning motors into already-existing and relatively attractive vehicles, automakers could preserve good looks while increasing environmental friendliness.

While the industry is throwing its hands into the air claiming that consumers don't want alternative energy vehicles, consumers like us are throwing their hands into the air wondering why alternative energy vehicles have to be so darn ugly.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

News

.... Moderate drinking promoted in college
.... Senate presented with butts to prove point
.... Study: Textbook publishers use unfair tactics
.... Athletic department budget improves, scholarships rise
.... NEWS IN A FEW
.... CSULB to host festival celebrating diverse community

 

Opinion

.... Our View: Nice cars can save the planet
.... Tomorrow, recognize our future
.... Clean the Earth and the White House
.... Smoke-free: the way to be for CSULB

Sports

.... Team U.S.A. has too much for 49er water polo
.... Former Dirtbag may return this weekend
.... Banged up Lakers head to Houston
.... Competing against a different opponent

 

 

 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved