VOL. LIV, NO. 64
California State University, Long Beach January 29 , 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jeff Overley
Opinion Editor

Trent Loomis
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jon Cook
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Jennie Lessel
Production Staff


Lego Hartanto
Webmaster

 

. News  
 

Prop. 55 to help schools, hurt state

By Monica Pardee
On-line Forty-Niner

California voters and Cal State University students will face a difficult decision when going to the polls this March 2 to give money for building and renovations throughout the state's public schools, colleges and universities while putting the state another $24.7 billion into debt, or not. In a time of fiscal emergency the Primary Election Ballot is loaded with bond measures and spending bills, some designed to help dig California out of debt.

According to the official voter information guide published by the state, Prop. 55, also known as the Kindergarten – University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, would allow for $12.3 billion for building construction and facility renovations in public schools, colleges and universities.

"It is very important that all of our students know how important this is," Chancellor Charles Reed said. "I would like to see all of our students, in our own self-interest, support the bond."

The second of twin bond measures, the previous in November 2002, Prop. 55 would award much less to Cal State Long Beach. Prop. 47 awarded the university $22.8 million for a library addition and renovation that has not yet been begun. The Prop. 47 funding totaled $13.05 billion for public schools, colleges and universities.

The 23 CSU campuses will share the $690 million and each campus will delegate its own prioritized building project. CSULB will be allocated just over $1 million for its building projects, according to Rick Gloady, director of media relations.

In spite of the $10 billion California budget deficit estimated for this year, the proposition would, if repaid over the next 30 years, create a $24.7 billion debt of its own. This debt would constitute an average payment for the state of around $823 million per year, according to the official voter information guide.

Originally known as Assembly Bill 16, the proposition passed in the Assembly and Senate by a large majority. Proponents of the proposition argue that California's schools are in need of renovation and repairs, and with overcrowded classrooms money is needed to build new classrooms to support the flood of population growth throughout the state.

Organizations promoting the bond measure include the California Chamber of Commerce, the California State PTA and the California Teachers Association.

Opponents of the proposition argue that $28 billion of the $73 billion in approved bonds has not been issued, according to the official voter information guide. The $12.3 billion bond measure would be on the same ballot as Prop. 57, a $15 billion bond measure proposed to help California better cope with its current fiscal crisis. Prop. 57 would take an estimated 14 years to pay off using sales tax revenue.

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved