VOL. LIV, NO. 120
California State University, Long Beach May 26, 2004
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Miguel A. Lopez
Managing Editor

Tina Page
News Editor

Sonya Smith
City Editor

Jeff Overley
Opinion Editor

Trent Loomis
Diversions Editor

Karl Peterson
Sports Editor

Jon Cook
Photo Editor

Beverly Munson
Advertising/Business Manager

Marcela Juarez
Esther Song

Business Staff

J. M. Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

Jennie Lessel
Production Staff


Lego Hartanto
Webmaster

 

. News  
 

UC system regents approve $700 student fee increase for next year

By Katy Tang
The California Aggie

(U-Wire) DAVIS — University of California students can expect a rise in student fees for the upcoming school year, as a result of a vote by the University of California Board of Regents on Thursday to approve the 2004-2005 budget.

After postponing the approval of the fee hikes on Wednesday due to a tie vote by the board’s Committee on Finance, the regents met at UC-San Francisco for a final vote and approved the student fee increases 14-2.

The budget incorporated revisions made after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s compact agreement with the UC and California State University systems, and includes a 14 percent fee increase for undergraduates and 20 percent for graduates and out-of-state students. The increases will amount to $700 for resident undergraduates, $1,050 for resident graduates, and roughly $3,000 for many professional school students.

UC student regent Matt Murray, who voted against the fee increases, said that the university needs to come to a better understanding with the government regarding student fee hikes.

“It’s important to recognize that this is part of a larger state budget process, and that the university doesn’t have full control over money that we get from the state,” he said. “I think it’s an incredibly important to recognize that the university budget in the end is decided by the politics in Sacramento, and the people who care need to raise their support there.”

Professional school students will receive the biggest blow, as fees will increase by about 30 percent. However, nursing schools will be exempt from the increases, and professional school students will not be subject to the 20 percent increase in nonresident tuition.

“The size of the professional fee increases, in particular, is troublesome to us all,” Dynes said in a press release. “In the future, longer-term planning should give us a better understanding of where professional fee levels need to be and should help students plan their own budgets for changing fee levels.”

Regent Ward Connerly, who had voted against the fee increases at Wednesday’s meeting, reversed his decision in the final vote in order to not undermine the recent compact agreement reached by Dynes and the governor.

During the debate with the board’s Committee on Finance, Connerly had expressed concerns regarding the compact and its ability to hold up “when times go south.”

Several other regents said they did not want to raise student fees, but found it necessary given the state’s fiscal crisis.

Among the regents’ biggest concerns on Thursday was the UC’s legal obligation to notify students ahead of time about the new cost of attending school.

A lawsuit against the UC is still pending after the university was sued last year for waiting until the last minute to raise student fees. The university did not comment on the case for violating its own policy to notify students about the new student fees.

“We really do have a moral and legal obligation to tell students what the fees are going to be,” Dynes said in an article for The Sacramento Bee. “It’s really painful, but it would be more painful not to do it.”

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved