Beltre
or Bonds for NL MVP?
For the last three years, baseball, and
the National League in particular, have
been dominated and left awestruck by one
man - Barry Bonds.
In
2001 his home run assault on the major
league record books began as he broke
Mark McGwire's single season home run
record by clubbing 73 out of the park
en route to winning his record fourth
Most Valuable Player (MVP) award.
In
2002 he batted .370 for the season to
lead the majors, and hit an astounding
46 home runs while being walked 198 times
to break his own single-season walk record.
The season ended with a trip to the World
Series and his fifth MVP award.
In
2003 the domination continued with a .341
average, 45 more home runs, another walk
record and his third-straight MVP award
- giving him six for his career.
2004 was no different for Bonds.
This
season at age 40, Bonds claimed his second
National League (NL) batting title, hit
another 45 home runs, broke his own single-season
record with 232 walks and set the single
season on base percentage mark at .609.
All this while playing a gold glove caliber
left field, recording 11 outfield assists
and a.983 fielding percentage.
Bonds
carried a very mediocre San Francisco
Giants squad on his back all season long.
So
as usual, the 2004 season, just like the
past three Major League Baseball (MLB)
campaigns will end with Bonds getting
another MVP award with relatively little
or no argument from the media or the fans,
right?
From
the stats listed above, and the precedent
set by the last three season's, voters
can easily say yes.
But
I have a feeling things might end a little
differently this year.
In
Los Angeles, the Dodgers' miracle season
and charge to the postseason was a combined
team effort. But you cannot overlook or
downplay the efforts of third baseman
Adrian Beltre, who led that charge with
an MVP caliber season, which equaled and
in my opinion surpassed that of Barry
Bonds.
The
25-year-old Dominican Republic native
Beltre was finally able to put together
all his talent and highly touted potential
to put up break through numbers, and take
the Dodgers back to the postseason.
During
the Dodgers' unexpected climb to the top
of the National League West, Beltre was
simply, The Man.
Coming
off a season in which he batted a paltry
.240 with a then career-high 23 home runs,
expectations were not high for Beltre
or the Dodgers.
But
I guess that is why they play the game.
In
2004 Beltre led the major leagues with
48 home runs, was ranked fourth with a
.334 average, third with 121 RBIs, 12th
with 104 runs and was one of only eight
major leaguers to record 200 hits on the
season.
In
addition, his .629 slugging percentage
was good enough for fourth in the league,
and his 376 total bases were second in
the majors and the most in Dodgers' franchise
history.
And
although Beltre was snubbed of an All-Star
Game appearance in favor of early season
MVP candidate Scott Rolen, and Florida
Marlins' Mike Lowell, his strong defensive
play included a .978 fielding percentage
with only 10 errors.
Another
little known fact is that he did all of
this with extremely painful bone spurs
in his ankle, which he suffered from after
fouling a ball of his foot in a game against
the Marlins in early May.
Beltre's
season was also one of the top offensive
outputs in the illustrious history of
the Dodger organization. The 48 homeruns
came one short of equaling teammate Shawn
Green's record of 49, but were good enough
to set the franchise record for home runs
by a right-handed batter.
Beltre
was the centerpiece of the 2004 Dodgers.
His strong play kept the Dodgers in first
place for 153 out of 171 days of the season.
Even
more amazing to look at when considering
Beltre's deserving of the award, is that
26 of his 48 home runs either gave the
Dodgers the lead or proved to be the game
winner.
And
just like any MVP would, Beltre finished
the season strong, batting .350 with 63
RBIs in the second half of the season,
including an enormous month of September
in which he hit six homeruns, knocked
in 23 and scored 13 runs to claim the
NL Player of the Month award.
Now
the question becomes, who is the NL MVP?
If
one were to decide strictly based on numbers
it would be a toss up. While Beltre had
more home runs, RBIs and hits, Bonds was
only three homers behind him, but can
also boast a record .609 on-base percentage,
.812 slugging percentage and 232 walks
- 120 of which were intentional.
Bonds
definitely strikes more fear in the hearts
of pitchers, leaving him with one or two
good pitches to hit each day. This speaks
volumes for his patience and plate discipline.
Perhaps the most astonishing stat for
Bonds this year is that he homered, (with
45 on the season) more then he struck
out (41).
Beltre
hasn't established himself as that kind
of a feared hitter, but then again he
is only 25.
Another
point to factor is the missing postseason
birth on Bonds' 2004 accomplishment list.
Every player reporting to Spring training
comes with one goal in mind - to get to
the playoffs, and ultimately to win a
ring.
This
is something that has eluded Bonds throughout
his career, and while that has nothing
to do with the debate about this year's
MVP, the fact that Beltre was able to
lead his team into the playoffs certainly
does.
Without
a trip to the playoffs and a chance to
win a ring, all of Bonds' historic numbers,
records and accolades are nothing more
than individual accomplishments collected
while playing a team sport.
Sure,
Bonds is the best player of this generation,
and maybe of all time, but should he automatically
be awarded the MVP year after year because
of his past accomplishments?
I'm not saying that Bonds doesn't deserve
his last three MVP awards, he certainly
does!
And
I'm not saying that Bonds' accomplishments
this season are not worthy of MVP consideration.
Heck, in some years numbers like his would
be good enough to win the award with virtually
little debate, like he has done the last
three years!
The
point I'm trying to make is that when
someone unexpected, and not as highly
touted as the perennial MVP candidate
that Bonds is, steps up to the plate and
consistently shines all season long, plays
hurt all year, is among the league leaders
in nearly every statistical category,
plays solid defense and leads his team
into the postseason (unlike Bonds), they
deserve to be recognized.
Beltre
was already snubbed of an All-Star appearance,
and assuredly would not have received
as much media attention had his traditionally
lowly Dodgers not been in the playoff
race.
But
that doesn't change the fact that there
is only one player who accomplished all
these things in 2004.
His
name is Adrian Beltre, and he more than
anyone deserves the MVP award.