VOL. LV, NO. 32
California State University, Long Beach October 21, 2004
.
 
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Trent Loomis
Managing Editor

L'oreal Battistelli
City Editor

Kara Ogushi
Assistant City Editor

Heather Stamp
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Michael Bower
Sports Editor

Tracey Roman
Photo Editor

Joe Cho

Jon Cook

Yulian Danusastro
Staff Photographers

Steve Padilla
Graphic Artist

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Letter to the Editor

The Three Strikes Laws were not written to conform to the intent of the voters. A "violent" crime for the first two strikes under present law can be a teenager taking a bicycle out of someone's open garage (which is a residential burglary), or setting fire to the trash in a trash can (arson). Then the third strike can be any felony, such as the possession of narcotics, or a third shoplifting conviction (a felony in California).

As a result, 64.5 percent of everyone serving a second or third strike in California is serving time for a non-violent offense. California has three times more people serving a third strike sentence of 25 years to life for marijuana offenses than for robbery, rape and murder combined. Each prisoner costs California taxpayers over $25,000 per year.

I'm voting for Proposition 66 to amend the Three Strikes Laws to their original intent. Our prison space should be reserved for those who commit violent crimes. After minimal jail time, non-violent offenders should be placed on a strict probation program, and required to get a job to compensate their victims.
— Bill Holmes

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved