VOL. LV, NO. 28
California State University, Long Beach October 14, 2004
.
 
     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Sonya Smith
Editor in Chief

Trent Loomis
Managing Editor

L'oreal Battistelli
City Editor

Kara Ogushi
Assistant City Editor

Heather Stamp
News Editor


Gerry Wachovsky
Diversions Editor

Elysse James
Opinion Editor

Michael Bower
Sports Editor

Tracey Roman
Photo Editor

Joe Cho

Jon Cook

Yulian Danusastro
Staff Photographers

Steve Padilla
Graphic Artist

Beverly Munson
General Manager

Jennie Lessel
Assistant Ad/Business Manager

Sara Watanasirisuk

Stacy Hopper
Office Assistants

Jamie Eggleston
Production Manager

Kari Schneider
Assistant Production Manager

 

 

. News  
 

Bush's War on Terror protects America

In the midst of deep national shock and grief, President George W. Bush boldly declared a war on global terrorism. On Sept. 20, 2001, in an address to a joint session of Congress and the American people he clearly stated, "Our war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. Americans should not expect one battle but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have seen. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.'

At that moment, Bush provided a measure of comfort and security to the devastated families and fearful citizens of America while simultaneously broadcasting a conspicuous message to the perpetrators and those of their ilk world-wide — their days of heinous savagery and lawlessness were about to end.

Bush continued by saying that our nation and this generation has been given the mission of "lift[ing] a dark threat of violence from our people and our future... We will not tire, we will not falter and we will not fail.' Bush also said, "The course of the conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain' and ultimately, through American strength and resolve, global terrorism would be defeated, just as communism had been defeated in the Cold War.

In accordance with his word, Bush ordered the invasion of Afghanistan. The United States military led an international coalition, pummeling the rogue Taliban government. In spectacular fashion, the coalition delivered the opportunity for a free Afghanistan within three weeks. Three years of struggle has wrought untold advances and accomplishments, including recent historic elections and three-quarters of Al Qaeda members being brought to justice. But where is bin Laden? Many believe he dead, considering that he has not appeared publicly for over three years. Others contend that the U.S. has lost its focus in the war on terror by allowing him to escape. To the contrary — coalition troops are still in Afghanistan working to root out terrorism. The next front in the global war on terror quickly became Iraq.

Deposing Saddam Hussein and affecting regime change in Iraq was a policy of President Bill Clinton's administration, however, it never took place under his command. Before Clinton left office in 2000, The Center for Terrorism Research (www.terrorism.com) published an expert analysis aimed at advising the new president regarding U.S. policy to combat terrorism. Unless the recommendations were implemented, the U.S. would remain in a reactive, hostage-type position.

Tragically, after only eight months in office, Bush was forcefully thrust into defensively implementing what is commonly called "The Bush Doctrine' of preemption, in other words, destroy the enemy before they destroy us. No president in U.S. history has ever had to face an enemy of this magnitude. However, all succeeding presidents will regularly deal with this adversary — precisely the reason why our upcoming presidential election is so crucial.

Bush and Senator John F. Kerry have vastly different and distinctly obvious worldviews regarding the role of America, national security and foreign policy. If both men's perspectives are carefully and honestly analyzed in a historic context of their respective words and actions, it becomes evident that one man's approach will strengthen America's security, thus averting more terrorist attacks on U.S. soil; the other man's approach will weaken America's security, thus inviting more terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Your vote will determine our security for generations to come.

Michelle Gomez is a third year political science and journalism major at CSULB.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2004 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved