Record
companies new efforts yield old results
By
Kevin Cape
Online Forty-Niner
Contributing Writer
Despite recent efforts by the recording
industry to boost the appeal and use of
authorized, paid download services, most
students are staying "economical."
The
most recent attempt by the recording industry
came last week when Saratoga Springs,
N.Y.-based Wurld Media announced that
three of the four major recording companies
— SONY BMG Music Entertainment,
Universal Music Group and Warner Music
Group — have licensed their entire
catalogues to Peer Impact, Wurld Media's
new peer-to-peer file sharing software
that is in the final stages of beta testing.
The
company has yet to release prices or payment
methods, but songs will not be purchased
on an individual track basis. The software
will allow paying member users to trade
music in a closed network.
But
most students still feel better about
trading for free on an open network.
"Who
cares if [the software] has new features,"
said junior creative writing major Robert
Uchida. "Students would still rather
get their music for free."
Uchida,
along with a majority of students surveyed,
does not believe any of the efforts to
sway downloaders to the legal methods
of file-swapping will have any significant
effect.
"I
don't think students are willing to pay
[for online music] when they can get it
for free," said Jessica Rinehart,
a junior art and marketing double major.
"I've never paid [for a download]."
When
asked what effect Pepsi's free-download
promotion had on senior communications
student Matt Rapping switching to paid
downloads he said, "None whatsoever.
The free download software is just too
sloppy. And it left my computer too susceptible
to viruses."
But
unfortunately for the music industry's
big business, sloppy is just fine for
most of the student population.
"Maybe
the older generations that have careers
and can afford to buy music will do it,"
said Jacob Hastert, a junior criminal
justice major. "But the rest of us
poor college students are screwed."
Recent
efforts have also been made by the music
industry to sway downloaders with pleas
for the wellbeing of the artists. A number
of Internet sites have been created to
back the plea.
According
to musicunited.org, there are four main
reasons not to download music illegally
from the Web, one of which is that it
"betrays the songwriters and recording
artists who create it."
But
the list does not include the fact that
it seriously hurts the recording companies'
revenue from album sales, a phantom fifth
point that students aren't missing.
"After
all the fees they have to pay, the artists
don't even make any money off of their
CDs," Rinehart said. "It's the
record execs that make all the money."
Hastert
said, "It's [record companies] just
trying to make more money, it's them trying
to be the good guys [when they're not]."
So
how does Rinehart feel about the executives
making an emotional plea for the "betrayal"
of the artists? "I think it's bulls—t."
Hastert
said including the fifth point would not
quite have the same effect as a plea for
artists. "I am not for stealing from
the individual. But I am for stealing
from major corporations."