VOL. LIII, NO. 133
California State University, Long Beach August 14, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Justin Diemert
News/City Editor

Zamna Avila
Opinion Editor

Jamie Ouye
Diversions Editor

Michelle Siazon
Sports Editor

 

. News  
 

Our View

Recall hopefuls have soared to nearly 250, but many of us may not be considering other issues that California will face in the Oct.

7 recall election. While media coverage has focussed on the prominent hopefuls such as Arnold Schwarzenegger and Larry Flynt, unequal attention has been given to proposed measures, such as Proposition 54.

Prop. 54 also known as the "Racial Privacy Act," was initially pushed to qualify for the March 2004 presidential primary ballot by University of California regent Ward Connerly. However, the anti-Davis recall has pressed the initiative on the recall ballot.

The aim of the initiative is to prohibit government agencies from gathering race and ethnicity data from California residents.

Supporters of this measure argue could help lead the state to become a more color-blind society. The question is whether our society is ready to do away with information on the diverse groups within the state. In some respects the measure has an overly optimistic perspective. It would be great that we would be at a point in history where injustices and institutional racism did not exist, but the truth is that they do exist. In a utopian society where statistical information would actually be useless and in fact, racist, the measure would go well. Yet neither California, nor the United States is at a point in which we can afford to put the civil liberties of under-represented groups at a loss.

Many of us may not like to be viewed as just a number, but it is crucial to realize that numbers count. How else would information be used to provide programs inclusive to diverse ethnic groups such as breast cancer in women of color? Measures are useful in approximating what services could be provided to improve the quality of life in local and statewide regions.

Another concern that arises if Prop. 54 were to pass is the assessment and accountability to hate crimes and racial profiling. Prop. 54 would make it more difficult for law enforcement agencies to do their jobs in halting hate crimes. In the same respect, racial profiling may not be able to be tracked from data obtained during traffic stops in determining whether members of a certain group may be specifically targeted.

As university students, we must take the time to read this and other measures so that we are able to vote with an educated mindset on the Oct. 7 election. Let's not just focus on Hollywood hyped gubernatorial election. Look at the laws that could be passed, before we spend another year wishing we took a stand on something that affects the state on perhaps an even greater scale.




 



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved