VOL. LIII, NO. 133
California State University, Long Beach August 14, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Justin Diemert
News/City Editor

Zamna Avila
Opinion Editor

Jamie Ouye
Diversions Editor

Michelle Siazon
Sports Editor

 

. News  
 

Music sharing debated

By Danielle Lagana
Summer Forty-Niner

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has brought hundreds of subpoenas to the federal courts for copyright infringement against people downloading music from file sharing programs such as Kaaza and Limewire, and your name could be among them.

"The RIAA's targeting of downloads is based on several things. An estimated 60 million Americans are now trading music and
other files online. That's more than the number that voted for President Bush in the 2000 election. This means that the problem is, to the RIAA, of significant proportion," said Dave McClure, president of the U.S. Internet Industry Association.

According to the RIAA, it "defends artists and record labels from pirates who sell and distribute fake copies of their music;"
however, many targets of the subpoenas are file sharers that generally do not redistribute the music files.

"The content industry is well aware of the damages that can be done even if there is no commercial gain," McClure said.
A case a few years ago, involving a student placing large amounts of software on a university server for downloading, concluded that under the laws at that time he could not be convicted because he did not personally profit from his actions.

"The content industry therefore lobbied for and got a change in the law, dubbed the No Electronic Theft Act, which makes it a
crime to violate copyrights even if you do not profit from the act," McClure said.

Cal State Long Beach students have felt the fire. Copyright infringement has left some students expelled and others under
investigation.

"We are actively monitoring and managing our campus Internet bandwidth based on network applications," said Steve La, director of Network Service. "Our university does have computing user policy to address copyrighted materials. In general, it is illegal under the federal law and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

La says many students and peer-to-peer file sharers are not aware of the spy agent, known as spyware, that transfers the users' information to an unknown site without the user being notified.

"These types of activities are more than a simple annoyance; some may consider their privacy is being invaded," La said.

Several CSULB students refused comment on this issue for fear of the federal law consequences and campus policy.

Buddy Clark, lawyer and drummer of Orange County said he doesn't think any government agency has the right to come into
private homes by way of computer.

However, Clark feels differently about file sharing. "I think it's great," he said. "The more the [songs] are played, the more the
band is known, the more people show at the live shows and the more people buy all the goodies the band sells. It's called
promotions, and all bands need it no matter how big they are."

The issues are many and can become confused.

"File sharing itself isn't illegal," said Greg Bildson, CTO of file sharing service Limewire. "There is plenty of legitimate content
out there. The RIAA tactics are heavy-handed and we have major problems with them. Their use of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (DMCA) to access account information from the Internet service providers appears to violate citizens' right of due process under the law and users' privacy."

Because of the DMCA Web site, owners are not liable for providing portals that people use to swap files.

"On Download.com we list software in a way that people can easily find but we neither create, sell, nor host the files," said Wayne Cunningham, senior editor for Download.com. "We have no legal responsibility about what software does or how it is used because we merely point to it, which is an editorial function."

The lawsuits targeting file sharers and the means to find these people are problems that have yet to be solved. However, a recent court decision in Massachusetts denied the RIAA information about students from MIT and Boston College. The senate is also investigating the hundreds of subpoenas the RIAA has issued.

"The issue is whether the RIAA should be able to obtain the identity of music downloaders without filing a lawsuit against the downloader for copyright infringement," McClure said. "The RIAA has gotten a judge in the federal system to approve its use of a shortcut in due process. The same judge heard the appeal of his own decision, but that decision now goes to a higher court for a ruling."

Web sites like boycott-RIAA.com encourage file sharers to write to their local representatives and provides electronic forms to do so.

Because of the vast number of subpoenas issued to file sharers, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has created a link in which file sharers, past or present, can see if they have been a target of the RIAA.

To see if your name is on the list of subpoenas, visit www.eff.org.

College students seem to have a large number of file sharers among them.

"We recommend that students speak up about these issues and that they help educate the general public about what is going on," said Bildson. "Laws are made to enrich citizens' lives, not to empower permanent monopolies for big media companies."

"Congress is now facing the fact that is trying to deal with the biggest disconnect between consumers and the law since the days of Prohibition," McClure said.

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved