VOL. LIII, NO. 131
California State University, Long Beach July 31, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Rachelle Youngman
Editor in Chief

Justin Diemert
News/City Editor

Zamna Avila
Opinion Editor

Jamie Ouye
Diversions Editor

Michelle Siazon
Sports Editor

 

. News  
 

Controversy surrounds senior drivers
 

By Danielle Lagana
Summer On-line Forty-Niner

The day 86-year-old Russell Weller plowed through Farmer's Market in Santa Monica a great debate among the citizens of California began, calling senior citizens' driving privileges into question.

"We are concerned that an entire group of people are being painted as questionable drivers over one tragic incident," said Ray Mastalish, executive director, California Commission on Aging. "We don't tend to become critical of any other age group of drivers when they are involved in a similar type of incident, so we hope this does not happen with the senior community either."

According to the Task Force on Older Adults and Traffic Safety (OATS), age-related impairment often reduces a person's ability to drive safely and people age 65 and older have the highest traffic-related pedestrian death rates of any age in California.

The DMV doesn't require seniors to retake their vision and written exams until the age of 70.

"I think seniors should be required to take the DMV tests at age 60," said Kaye Buhrig, a caretaker of seniors for the past 20 years. "Mobility slows down, reactions are a little slower and they are a little more panicky. They don't think as quick. It's like they are stuck in what happens and aren't able to clearly think the way we would normally."

The Santa Monica tragedy is not the first incident of a senior hitting the gas instead of the brake. Aside from the grandmother that was recently on the news for accelerating instead of braking at a childcare center where she was to pick up her granddaughter, Buhrig said she witnessed an incident such as this in a K-mart parking lot.

"I saw an 80-year-old woman back out and accidentally put it in drive, hitting the car in front of her and then she put it in reverse and hit the car behind her," Buhrig said.

"When she got out of the car she said she couldn't figure out which on was the break."

Student Nancy Perez said, "I think they should get tested every year to every two years. They should have limits."

To encourage safety among senior drivers insurance, companies offer discounts each year for attending approved driver courses.

"The class they go through is like a remedial driver training. A classroom review of the rules, like stopping distance, slow down after dark, breaking distance and the like," says Bob Fields, Farmers Insurance agent.

"I don't think age should be a factor for driving. There are 35-year-olds who shouldn't be driving," Fields said. "If a guy is 100 he shouldn't be driving, I guess 100 should be the cut off."

Many are asking if the elderly are being treated justly. "The elderly are no different than anyone else; they wish to maintain their freedom, which requires access to an automobile in our society," said Cal State Long Beach sociology instructor, Dr. Gary Hytrek. "We value youth and de-value the elderly; we treat the elderly as burdens and our society reflects these feelings."

The National Center for Injury Prevention and Control reports drivers over the age 65 have higher crash-death rates per mile driven other than teen drivers.

During the year 2000, most traffic deaths that seniors were involved in the daytime. The NCIPC also reported, "age-related declines in vision, hearing, cognitive functions, and physical impairments may affect some older people's driving ability."

However, older drivers are more likely to wear seatbelts than younger drivers, they often drive when it's safe, and are less likely to drink and drive.

Before the Santa Monica incident the Department of Health and Human Services started a national goal of reducing motor vehicle-related deaths among people of all ages.

"I believe there are solutions, but not easy ones. I believe that for any solutions to be workable it will require us to fundamentally re-think the very structures of our culture and society," Hytrek said.

Some feel the controversy does not lie in growing older rather it stems in the lack of mobility offered to the seniors of our society.

"To me, the lesson we could learn from this terrible tragedy is that we in the greater metropolitan area of Los Angeles ought to think about creating a more effective public transportation system than we now have," said assistant sociology professor, Marc Flacks.

"The rebirth of Metro rail is great, but we need more of these kinds of public transportation options."

Flacks referred to an LA Times letter to the editor which encouraged young drivers to stop criticizing the elders and consider volunteering to drive vans that could transport at-risk elders to their appointments and shopping.
Dr. Hytrek said we have built cities and towns that are car friendly but pedestrian hostile and the programs that take seniors around are limited to business hours that aren't always convenient for those in need.

"The concern over whether or not the elderly have the basic capabilities to drive safely are misplaced; rather it misses the broader issues," Hytrek said.

Safe driving among senior citizens has been an ongoing concern. In April, OATS recommended the DMV institute an effective driver assessment and licensing practice as well as establish roadway infrastructure and land uses that practice and promote safety.


 

 

 

 


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved