VOL. LIII, NO. 76
California State University, Long Beach Feburary 19, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Environment sold out by greed


Nuclear reactors, toxic waste dumps, logging, emissions standards — a swell is building every year into an environmental tidal wave that the Environmental Protection Agency does not seem able to quell. You would think that once people realized the implications of our haphazard industry and commercial contamination standards our nation’s view of our imminent future would change, and perhaps some of its actions. Instead, the newspaper is full of reports of relaxing standards, of destructive government proposals and of waste that has no place to go.
 
Insatiable greed appears to be behind the move of selling our planet piecemeal to the highest bidder. But government agencies, some in place for the sole reason of protecting our environment, are at the forefront of this devastation, not the greedy corporations. Behind the diluted, insubstantial facade of environmental protection lay lobbyists and lawyers and liars and leeches.
 
In the nation, Bushes administration is steadily deregulating corporations and industry, flouting the 20th century’s attempt to atone for some of the damage it begat.
 
The federal government is now taking cues from the logging industry as Alaskan Republican Senator Ted Stevens proposes measures to reopen deforestation on federal lands.  The measures allow for road building in undeveloped forests and protect the forest management plan from legal attacks. Lobbying the plan from the position that the logging industry has deteriorated this measure undoes what environmentalist’s have been doing for a century: Protecting our forests from short-sighted greed.
 
From the land to the air the government is working hand-in-hand with the EPA to relax standards. Automobile emissions are second-rate compared with the toxic emission standards that the EPA plans to ease. Fumes from steel and pulp mills, petrochemical plants, auto factories and a variety of other industries are cancer-causing and will now be covered under an “opt-out” policy where companies can choose to regulate their own emissions. Favoring business is the new rage, but at what cost to the public?
 
The rest of the nation relies on the EPA but California has its own policies. Our VOC, or Volatile Organic Content, laws are the most stringent in the nation. These laws apply to paints, coatings and glues and place the burden of compliance upon the companies. Many products that can be sold in other states cannot even be shipped here. Regulated jointly by the Air Quality Management District and the EPA, California’s VOC laws protect our already polluted air from careless and indifferent contributions from companies that make enough cash to comply.
 
Although Southern California smog is the most obvious indicator of rampant pollution, we have other problems too. At the San Onofre nuclear power plant there is a 950-ton decommissioned reactor looking for a home. The surplus of radioactive material is destined for a nuclear waste dump in South Carolina, which people must justify, is as good a place as any; but getting it there has proved to be a problem. The Panama Canal has refused it passage based on the fact that it exceeds their maximum weight for radioactive materials by more than six times.
 
Superfund sounds like such a good thing unless you’re talking about refuse. The Casmalia toxic waste site in Santa Barbara County has an estimated clean up time of 20 years with a price tag totaling $272 million.
 
The Bush administration’s environmental policy is baffling, frustrating and unsustainable. As areas become more polluted, the rich will move up and out and the toxic plazas will remain for the underprivileged. Eventually there will be no place high enough and no place far enough away for big business and government agencies that just can not see it coming.
 
As the pollution faux pas of yesteryear come to a head today, we need an administration that will handle the past and the future of our environment with foresight, not
with greed. The current administration has proven that it just does not care.
 
Monica Pardee is a journalism major at Cal State Long Beach.



Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Dirtbag pitchers ace Cougar bats

.... Who knows about the Homecoming luau?

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved