VOL. LIII, NO. 109
California State University, Long Beach April 28, 2003
.
ADVERTISEMENT


     
 
 
 


Editorial Staff

Kimberly Pasquis
Editor in Chief

Rachelle Youngman
Managing Editor

Miguel Lopez
News Editor

Sonya Smith
Assistant News Editor

Justin Dimert
City Editor

Franklin Holman
Assistant City Editor

Tina Page
Opinion Editor

Jack Schneider
Diversions Editor

Todd Leland
Sports Editor

Brian Brannon
Photo Editor

Johnathan Cook
Chief Photo Editor

Michael Watanabe
Make-Up Editor

Chris Burnett
News Editorial Director

Gerard Greenidge
Webmaster

Manlo Ngai
Graphic Designer

 

. News  
 

Ourview

Uninsured may have hope


Universal health care in California would cost us very little. Bruce Bodaken, chairman and CEO of Blue Shield of California, commissioned a study in December to tally the cost of making health insurance a mandatory part of life in our state.
 
The cost analysis of the plan was led by Kenneth E. Thorpe, chairman of the Department of Health Policy and Management at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health.
 
The results of this study are surprising. Although a $7.8 billion tab sounds daunting, Thorpe suggested that the cost could easily be divided between the state government, which would pay $4.5 billion; businesses, which would pay about $3.2 billion; and individuals, who would pay $63 million.
 
Bodaken, a seemingly unlikely advocate of universal health care, said that a one percent sales tax or a 0.7 percent hike in the state income tax could help pay for health coverage for California’s 6.6 million uninsured residents.
 
Does this sound like too much? Not by any means. We are the only industrialized country that does not provide for some form of comprehensive health care coverage. Americans have an inherent resistance to taxes and impositions that dates back to our revolution.
 
We live in a very individualistic society, and that’s a good thing when it comes to improving one’s own situation. But we cannot afford to exist in our bubble any longer, Sept. 11 should have taught us that.
 
If we must look for more pragmatic reasons to help our fellow citizens, than we should take into account our economy. The more healthy people we have, the more good workers can be employed, which in turn helps our economy and improves upon our own lives.
 
Critics argue that it is the wrong time to address an issue such as universal health care because of our current budget deficit of $35 billion. But when will be the right time? The 6.6 million men, women and children currently suffering from the inability to see a doctor when they are sick do not feel better simply because they know we are in a budget crisis. Too many of us take for granted our ability to see a doctor or visit the emergency room.
 
Bodaken made an excellent point at the Sacramento Press Club.
 
“We believe it is a small price to pay for something as essential as education, or maybe even more so,” Bodaken said. “What if we said one in four kids don’t have to go to school? We wouldn’t tolerate it. So why do we tolerate this?”
 
We shouldn’t tolerate this. California should lead the way towards a more progressive society in which every person has the right to good health. How we do it can and should be debated. But we should do it. Why not now?


Calendar

Display Ads

Front Page

univmag

 

Sports

.... Mary Hegarty takes over at The Beach

.... Gauchos steal a win 6-5 with ninth inning rally

ADVERTISEMENT


.
©2002 Daily Forty-Niner. All rights reserved